It was a REVIEW!
And I am 100% CERTAIN that you did not try to "verify" ANY of the claims made by all those people who gave the movie a 10 star rating!
Or did you verify any of the ridiculous and totally false claims in this pseudo-documentary???
So this is PURELY IDEOLOGICAL!
You don't like criticism of this political propaganda movie, because you approve of it.
That's the best way to undermine your own brand.
Either you don't allow people to review movies or you simply accept ALL the reviews!
I can post a very detailed, documented review with tons of links, but I don't think you'll accept it, either. I'm not even sure you allow links to be embedded.
How do you "verify" anything people say about movies? Reviews are PERSONAL.
I cannot believe you started CENSORING reviews for political reasons. This is FASCISM.
Get a grip - this will not win you any elections.
People see right through this.
I posted my review and your rejection on my Facebook page - and I have over 3000 friends and over 1000 followers. That's a lot of exposure for your agenda-driven censorship.
Before jumping hastily to conclusion, I propose you share your review here so other contributor can shed an advice.
Here is the text of my review:
Yes, I can back up every single statement with links to valid sources and everything I say are well known facts that are not questionable.
2 years of Mueller "investigation" have turned up NOTHING except a few hundred thousand dollars spent by Russians on social media ads, which a US federal judge pointed out were totally legal and totally unrelated charges for people Mueller tried to pressure into providing accusations, unsuccessfully.
This is not a documentary, this is the most ridiculous propaganda lie in history. Hillary lost because she is a horrible, corrupt person and she was completely exposed by the DNC leaker Seth Rich, shot in the back of his head in DC after he gave DNC emails to Wikileaks.
This is not just glaringly obvious - young DNC volunteer workers are usually not shot at random at night as they walk home. And it wasn't a robbery, as the police initially claimed, as nothing was missing.
Assange explained in person that Seth Rich was their informant and had been murdered because of it.
There has never been any "Russian collusion".
The DNC fabricated the completely fake Steele dossier - a foreign agent who was hired specifically to create a plausible accusation of fraud in case Hillary lost the election. Which in itself speaks volumes!
The DOJ and FBI then went to the FISA court with this dossier, which they knew to be fake, to get a warrant to spy on Trump's entourage, which represented massive election fraud.
At no point could anyone explain what the alleged "Russian influence" was supposed to be.
"Fake news"? Seriously? Millions of people would have changed their vote because of a few messages they saw on social media - inserted among GIGANTIC quantities of pro-Hillary propaganda on all channels, from mainstream media to social media?
Hillary had not one, but TWO agencies that were funded with tens of millions of dollars whose ONLY job it was to counter any negative comments on Hillary online. And she received FREE propaganda and massive help from Google, Apple, Twitter and Facebook. Even her official campaign budget was TWICE as large as Trump's.
Trump was attacked and decried in the most vile and pathetic way on all on TV and on social media, yet he got elected.
That was because of 2 things: the absolutely abysmal Obama presidency and the psychopathy of Hillary. And for those who were well informed, her association with Huma Abedin, a fanatical and antisemitic Wahabi Muslim who was managing her entire campaign and who would have held a position of power in her administration. That was a gigantic cannon ball the US dodged.
The idea that some "conspiracy" is necessary to explain Hillary's failure is absolutely ridiculous.
At what point will the loser Democrats simply admit that they lost FAIR AND SQUARE against the better candidate?
This fake "documentary" is just another sign of their inability to cope with the fact that millions of Americans reject their ideology, their identity politics and the individuals representing them.
The kind of people who are taking over the Democrat party are not exactly an improvement. The Democrat "women's march" in New Orleans was just cancelled because the organizers were found to be antisemitic and anti-white. What in the world are the Democrats thinking by allowing the likes of Linda Sarsour become one of their figureheads?
For now, wealthy Jewish donors still represent 50% of the entire funding of the Democrat party. If the Democrat leadership don't change course, the rampant antisemitism among their very vocal and visible Muslim representatives will end up driving them away no matter how leftist they may be. And at that point, they can forget about winning any elections.And we'll get lots of stupid pseudo-documentaries about how something "unfair" happened.This is complete garbage!
I hope IMDB can change their tune and try to remain and impartial, unbiased, and fair play for people to share their honest opinions on film and related mediums. Trying to use a false claim that is not even really applicable to art forms such as cinema which is at least as subjective as it is objective (more so to some, less so to others) is pretty sneaky and unethical, some would say corrupt and manipulative.
Agreeing or disagreeing with the documentary is not what reviews are for.
Defending on debunking content is not what reviews are for.
Reviews should focus on how it was made. The style. The editing. The Sound Quality. Etc...
Weather it presented all facts. Or weather there were omissions.
Opinions about the content should be left to other media.
Opinions about the way the content is presented is welcome.
Avoid these things and your review should stand for all time.
Why you ask?
Because you left your political viewpoint out of the equation!
Reviews here are about how well or badly it was made.
Reviews are not a platform for Debating or Statements.
When you report bad reviews for consideration for removal there are only 4 choices.
Any review deviating from what I have described can be deemed "Not Relevant"
There is not enough evidence that IT IS a review!
I have over 3000 friends and over 1000 followers. That's a lot of exposure for your agenda-driven censorship.IMDb has around 90,000,000 Registered users!
What exposure was it you have?
This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.
This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.