[Poll] Nominations for the Worst Movie of All Time (Round 1)

  • 3
  • Idea
  • Updated 1 month ago
I am currently attempting to compile a list of some of the worst movies of all time. So now's your chance to help me out and get in on the action :)

The current list is here: https://www.imdb.com/list/ls042839302/  
(It starts empty)

Please provide what you believe to be the worst movie you have ever seen, and I will add it to the list, subject to the following submission guidelines:

1. The title must be a film
2. The title must not be a short (requires 45+ minutes runtime)
3. Please provide a reason for why you believe it deserves a nomination
4. Nominations can be independent of overall IMDB ratings - just because a movie is rated low or high overall does not mean you cannot nominate it.
5. Please limit your nominations to a maximum of 3 titles.

Once I've allowed sufficient time for people to make their suggestions I'll create a further poll (i.e. Round 2) whereby you'll be asked to vote from the list to narrow it down. After that, depending on the amount of titles, additional rounds (and corresponding lists) may be added until we can pinpoint the ultimate worst movie ever made. 

Have fun :D
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes

Posted 6 months ago

  • 3
Photo of albstein

albstein

  • 756 Posts
  • 1477 Reply Likes
Wow, this is one of the best, perhaps even the best, debut poll suggestion I've seen. Great job! You can make the link back to this thread clickable like this:

[Link=https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/-poll-nominations-for-the-worst-movie-of-all-time-round-1]


And if in the future you'd like a word to link to something (as in, "you can click here"), you can do it like this:

[Link=https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/-poll-nominations-for-the-worst-movie-of-all-time-round-1]here[/link]

I'll have to think more about the question before answering.
(Edited)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
No problem mate, it's linked to your GS profile now :)
(Edited)
Photo of ACT_1

ACT_1

  • 3619 Posts
  • 3494 Reply Likes
? ?
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/ot-almost-everything-ive-done-has-been-deleted
Posted 1 year ago
by albstein
- - -

Dan can delete ACT_1's message Monday ? ?
.

(Edited)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
I'm sure Dan or another Champion and/or IMDB rep can cleanup this thread when they get a chance. Thank you for reaching out and attempting to neaten things up. 
Photo of ACT_1

ACT_1

  • 3619 Posts
  • 3494 Reply Likes
Dan already deleted some of my junk here at my request  - and here are more

 albstein's message is an interesting history
.
(Edited)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Let's give them a few days (afterall it is the weekend) then if we still think things are messy I'll contact them directly requesting a cleanup. :)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Note: If someone has already nominated your movie there is no need to nominate it again. You will be able to vote for it in a subsequent round, but feel free to discuss any reasons you have for agreeing or disagreeing with any nomination in this current thread. 
(Edited)
Photo of Dan Dassow

Dan Dassow, Champion

  • 13950 Posts
  • 14544 Reply Likes
Richard Shepherd,

Thank for your poll suggestion and thank you for having a properly functioning discussion link in your list.

My IMDb User Name is dan_dassow
My user ID is https://www.imdb.com/user/ur0127678/

I would like to nominate two films:

Leonard Part 6
(1987)
The commercial for this film were truly annoying. When I watch the film on TV, the commercials provided welcome relief to an unfunny and cloying film.

C.H.U.D. (1984)
A nauseating take on incoherence.
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
It's a custom tracking link to the discussion, normally bit.ly formats MDB links as imdb.to/whatever but it didn't work for this one so I formatted the second part of the link. It just directs to the original page but allows me to access some analytic information, such as what country the viewers of the page are from etc... that way if I advertise the poll on Twitter etc I can tell where the traffic is coming from and what source is working best.  If this is bad practice I'll remove it and replace it with a direct link. 
(Edited)
Photo of Dan Dassow

Dan Dassow, Champion

  • 13950 Posts
  • 14544 Reply Likes
Richard Shepherd,

It's probably not a good idea to use compressed links. Unfortunately, they are frequently abused by spammers and people distributing malware. These kind of links are also likely to trigger Get Satisfaction's spam filter.

With your permission, I will remove these links from the posts in this thread.
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Yeah you can go ahead and remove them, it's not a big deal to me, they link directly to this thread so you could replace them with the direct link if you like (where appropriate). I originally only used them for readability purposes mainly, but now I know about the whole [link] syntax it's not needed. 

Cheers.
Photo of Dan Dassow

Dan Dassow, Champion

  • 13950 Posts
  • 14544 Reply Likes
Compressed links replaced / remove as indicated.
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Thanks Dan.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 16326 Posts
  • 18681 Reply Likes
I got two fer ya!
Billy the Kid Versus Dracula (1966)
Director: William Beaudine | Stars: John Carradine, Chuck Courtney, Melinda Casey, Virginia Christine
Dracula travels to the American West, intent on making a beautiful ranch owner his next victim. Her fiance, outlaw Billy the Kid, finds out about it and rushes to save her.

Blood of Dracula's Castle (1969)
Directors: Al Adamson, Jean Hewitt | Stars: John Carradine, Paula Raymond, Alexander D'Arcy, Robert Dix
Count Dracula and his wife capture beautiful young women and chain them in their dungeon, to be used when they need to satisfy their thirst for blood.

OK, they made a terrible 'Dracula' movie in 1966 with Carradine. So lets do another 'Dracula' movie three years later and use the ??? the"Same Actor"!!!.Oh, it'll be better. We'll get two directors! Yeah, that'll fix it!
Conclusion.......While they tried to copy the master. There can be only one! Roger Corman that is.

You could do a poll just on the copycat Corman phase in the sixties.


Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Thanks Ed, can I have your IMBD profile link (or show me how I can find it on GS) and I'll add those two with your credit for nomination. 

Cheers :)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Nevermind, I found it thanks to Albstein's tip. :)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Thanks Ed, credits been linked.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 16326 Posts
  • 18681 Reply Likes
OK
Photo of James The Movie Guy

James The Movie Guy

  • 287 Posts
  • 502 Reply Likes
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3404 Posts
  • 5699 Reply Likes
I guess I hate it because it's new; the Manos makers were trying (although terribly) and at least there weren't any scenes of hearing mountain lions or giving 50 percent discounts.  :)
Photo of James The Movie Guy

James The Movie Guy

  • 287 Posts
  • 502 Reply Likes
I still have to say Birdemic is in my top 5 of the worst movies I've ever seen. It's absolutely painful to watch and doesn't even get hilariously bad until the last 30 minutes where they end up fending the birds off with coat hangers.
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
I'll have to watch these 2 movies (and try to keep a straight face :p )
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3404 Posts
  • 5699 Reply Likes
Oh, I beg to differ... Rod's insufferable-ness, Natalie's Victoria's Secret job... Rod's awful friend... round numbers... Birdemic is the standard for all B movies to live by.  Manos is the close second, with Torgo legs, bad dubbing, and annoying soundtrack.  :)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
I own Birdemic and Manos, they are on my watchlist (personal not IMDB), I'll be moving it up a bit priority wise so that I can see what you guys are talking about :)

Looking forward to cringing at every frame!
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 2970 Posts
  • 3859 Reply Likes
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Okay cool, as long as I know you are satisfied with the way you are credited on the list. :)

If someone requests a GS link I'll be happy to do it that way, otherwise I'll generally default to their IMDB profile link, unless I cannot find it and they do not provide it. In which case I'll be leaving it unlinked for a while to allow them time to give me their link, if still no answer I'll link to their GS profile (because I can find that easily). 

Hope that clears some things up for you, and anybody else wondering the same thing.
Photo of ACT_1

ACT_1

  • 3619 Posts
  • 3494 Reply Likes


? ?

These are Lists not Names ...

8. Glitter (2001)
Nominated By Riverotter
https://www.imdb.com/list/ls042996901/

9. Birdemic: Shock and Terror (2010)
Nominated By: NarniaIsAwes
https://www.imdb.com/list/ls042607288/

11. Jack and Jill (I) (2011)
Nominated By: Joe Siegel
https://www.imdb.com/list/ls042905296/

15. The Weird World of LSD (1967)
Nominated By: Pencho15
https://www.imdb.com/list/ls042423218/
.

Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I added these when I was quite tired and I've obviously copied the wrong link across - sorry to all those affected. 

I'll fix it right now, thank you pointing this out to me. - I'm not new to IMDB but I am new to GS and Polls so this is a learning process for me, your help is truly appreciated. :)
Photo of albstein

albstein

  • 756 Posts
  • 1477 Reply Likes
I did the same mistake the other day, happens to everyone every once in a while :)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Updated and amended as indicated. Thank you again for pointing this out. If I make any more silly mistakes be sure to let me know - I'd rather live and learn than die in ignorance ;-)
Photo of riverotter

riverotter

  • 232 Posts
  • 382 Reply Likes
Troll 2
Glitter
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Thanks for the nominations, the list has been updated to reflect this and you have been credited for these suggestions :)
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3438 Posts
  • 5747 Reply Likes
(Edited)
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3438 Posts
  • 5747 Reply Likes
Also, I think maybe part of our difference is that I don't watch 'slasher' movies and you have, and probably the cheap ones of those are waaaay worse than say Birdemic, because it's just non-stop pointless gore with no plot.  Is that true?
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 2970 Posts
  • 3859 Reply Likes
NarniaisAwesome I've seen a lot of slashers and I adore that genre, yes. I must admit, reputation for them being pointless gorefests is not entirely undeserved, but the core of a slasher is what I call "ping-pong structure", where POV shifts from killer to victim. It amuses me how genre successfully makes audience playing chess with themselves. That structure can be used to a great success in any genre, but slashers just mastered it somehow so it's what I'm looking for when I watch them. I must admit, it's interesting to find slashers which use little to no gore or even no kills and yet somehow achieve the needed effect. 

In order to illustrate my point in 5 minutes: here's E-Type's music video (which I also added to IMDb, btw) for "Angels Crying". Cheesy eurodance song and dance moves aside it still impresses me with how it managed to replicate the tension from Friday the 13th (1980) (it is practically a remake of it) with no gore whatsoever. In fact most murders are implied and yet, effect is pretty much the same and is surprisingly unsettling. My favorite shot from that music video is when you see killer's disembodied pair of legs when he (she?) appears in front of victim. It's a classic slasher touch which messes your perception a bit and can make killer appear as an unstoppable machine, while in fact anyone can look as menacing if you only see the shoes and pants. 
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3438 Posts
  • 5747 Reply Likes
In my opinion, 'horror without gore' is very admirable, and somehow an even truer sign of talent.
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Narnia: Yeah, I probably should have explained more clearly in OP that I was more leaning towards bad movies you hate, not bad movies you love - but that's alright, it's only Round 1 - in Round 2 we'll be narrowing things down and in that round we'll probably see a lot of 'bad movies you love' not being included.
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Narnia: Yeah, I probably should have explained more clearly in OP that I was more leaning towards bad movies you hate, not bad movies you love - but that's alright, it's only Round 1 - in Round 2 we'll be narrowing things down and in that round we'll probably see a lot of 'bad movies you love' not being included.
Photo of joe siegel

joe siegel

  • 583 Posts
  • 935 Reply Likes
I have 2 options that you could consider; Jack and Jill (2011) with Adam Sandler, is an ode to incoherence and stupidity with the worst performances I could have seen and Adam makes them doubles (Lamentably appears Al pacino, which is my favorite actors) Fantastic Four (2015) I can only say that it is terrible.
I really do not come across many movies that I dislike to the point of considering them as such, because I am very cautious when choosing haha.
(Edited)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
List updated and credited. Thanks for the nominations Joe! I appreciate you giving some reasons as to why you think they should be on the list. Also, as Narnia says above, you are welcome to choose one more if you like :)
Photo of joe siegel

joe siegel

  • 583 Posts
  • 935 Reply Likes
Oh, good. My third option is Armageddon by Michael Bay, It's too ridiculous, this is a movie where logic was not used and they did not even try to give coherence to the story, it seems more like a movie Made by children who have no idea what they are talking about
(Edited)
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 2970 Posts
  • 3857 Reply Likes
NarniaisAwesome Nah, I've seen so much worse then Fan4stic. Movie was ridiculously botched by last-minute decisions, but it's clear in some scenes that if Josh Trank's vision was preserved better it would have been a fresh take, at least. I really loved some Cronenberg-like scenes in the movie and while it might seem out of place when adapting these characters, I've never seen that touch applied to their predicament before. It has a lot in common with Scanners (1981) which, while better received, still was never a critical darling. The problem is that visuals of the botched attempt at Fantastic Four were dated at the time of the release, while 1981 full-on practical effort still holds up well and never had the same kind of limitation. 
(Edited)
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3434 Posts
  • 5744 Reply Likes
Oh, I've seen worse than 4, too, I guess I just dislike most superhero films enough to never want to watch it again.  It's just a bit 'over the top.'  ;)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Joe: Armageddon has been added and credited. Thanks for your input :)
Photo of albstein

albstein

  • 756 Posts
  • 1477 Reply Likes
Head full of Honey (2014). This movie exploits Alzheimer's as a resource of whacky "comedy". Between hysteria and lowest attempts at tear-jerking, there is no space for nuance. Dieter Hallervorden, a great versatile actor, is humiliated in the lead role. Til Schweiger acts and directs, and it is hard to say which job he's worse at (even basic aspects like editing look amateurish). In a delusion of grandeur, he likes to consider himself the most important living German filmmaker and an international star. At least the second illusion was thrashed when the American remake with Nick Nolte failed spectacularly, both at the box office and with the critics.

Fifty Shades Darker (2017). This movie is disgusting. I wish it was for the sex scenes, but they are rather prudish. There is neither any daring display of sexuality nor a hint of eroticism. No, what I find despicable about the movie is exemplified in the scene where the main characters go to a fancy restaurant and giggle at a nervous waiter - and except for one brief moment from afar we only ever see his torso, as in a Warner Bros. cartoon. The Fifty Shades movies fetishize a world of money, luxury and power in the hollowest way and bear a contempt for anything and anyone that does not fit into it.
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Added and credited. Thank you for taking the time to thoroughly explain why you feel these two are so bad, it's great that we are getting such a diverse range of films for the list. :) 
Photo of ElMo

ElMo

  • 3714 Posts
  • 4043 Reply Likes
I think there are two kinds of "worst" movies:
- the so-bad-they're-good 
- the so-bad-they're-bad

And we can say that the latter films are worse than the former... a film like Plan 9 From Outer Space doesn't have any pretension to be a masterpiece and it's a B-movie providing what people accept  from B-movies and it is still more forgivable than a film that takes itself seriously and still does something as despicable as manipulating an audience or insulting its intelligence.

I guess the poll is about the movies we can truly say "I hate its guts", so maybe you should be careful not to mix them with the same old movies who are always nominated among the worst but that we, movie lovers, enjoy a little for their campy value and because they're entertaining in a laughable way.
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3438 Posts
  • 5747 Reply Likes
I agree completely!
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Thank you for bringing this up EIM. Indeed, the flavour of this poll is more about the latter option as you so rightly point out. I don't mind if people want to nominate films that are 'so bad you love love them' but ideally, as you suggest, the main idea here is to find a movie so appalling that every moment it takes of your time feels like a little bit of your soul being ripped away :)
Photo of ElMo

ElMo

  • 3714 Posts
  • 4043 Reply Likes
No problem, it's your poll of course, but I think there's more than a subtle nuance between the two categories, it's basically the same fine line between the lovable loser or the poor schmuck and the truly despicable person (as far as our perceptions go)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Yeah, agreed. I'll be making it more clear that this poll is more focused on 'bad as bad' rather than 'bad as good' when the next round opens. :)
Photo of Pencho15

Pencho15

  • 1316 Posts
  • 1137 Reply Likes

My nominee is The Weird World of LSD (1967)


Not only is a film with the lowest imaginable production values, with no one that has the right to be called an actor or even something remotely similar to a plot. It is also an offensive film that tries to keep people away from LSD, but does this with lies, missinformation and fear which is pretty much the worst way to tackle a problem.
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Added and credit. Thanks for the suggestion :)

I haven't seen The Weird World of LSD in its entirety but I have seen bits and pieces of it - to me its nothing more than a propaganda film - and that is usually an umbrella term for categorically bad films - not just because of the quality but because of the content. 

As you suggest misinformation and fear are devices of control but are not rational solutions to real world problems.
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3438 Posts
  • 5747 Reply Likes
Richard, 
So sorry to keep switching things around, but I must replace replica with the Star Wars Holiday Special.  :)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
I've amended the list to match your above replacement request. 

It's not a problem to switch things around/change your mind at this stage - that's part of the idea of having multiple rounds to the nominations. Nothing is locked in at the moment, but later, in future rounds things will be more tight - but don't worry, there'll be ample time and notifications before that happens - so feel free to keep revising your suggestions as often as you like until then. :)
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3438 Posts
  • 5747 Reply Likes
Okay, thank you!  I will Replica in round 2.  :)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Sounds good to me.

FYI: Exactly when Round 2 opens (following this rounds closure) will be entirely dependent on the level of activity of this round. In other words, when people seem to have stopped nominating/discussing for a few days I'll post a notice saying this round will end in a few days after that - allowing for those sitting on the fence to still have a chance.

I realize some people might only check in to GS once a week (or less) so I want the majority of the community to be exposed to the opportunity to nominate - but at some point the time will come where we must move on. :)
Photo of ACT_1

ACT_1

  • 3619 Posts
  • 3494 Reply Likes


Suggestion

Sort by Ratings ? ?

11.  Replica (2005) -  1.6
9  .  Birdemic: Shock and Terror (2010) - 1.8
6  .  Manos: The Hands of Fate (1966) - 1.9 
8  .  Glitter (2001) -  2.2
2  .  Leonard Part 6 (1987) -  2.2
10.  The Guy from Harlem (1977) -  2.3
7  .  Troll 2 (1990) -  2.8
4  .  Billy the Kid Versus Dracula (1966) -  3.2
5  .  Blood of Dracula's Castle (1969) -  3.2
12.  Jack and Jill (I) (2011) -  3.3
16.  The Weird World of LSD (1967) -  3.3 
1  .  Adult Babies (2017) -  4
13.  Fantastic Four (2015) -  4.3
15.  Fifty Shades Darker (2017) -  4.6
3  .  C.H.U.D. (1984) -  5.6
14.  Head Full of Honey (2014) -  6.6


Worst Movie at the Top of the list ? ?

.

Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
I appreciate your suggestion and will take it into consideration.

At this point in time, as of Round 1 of the nominations - the element of overall rating on IMDB is independent of this list - that's part of the theme behind it - because of this, currently, the list order will just be in the order I receive the nominations. 

Ratings may come into play in later rounds, such as in tie-breaker scenarios, more will become clear in the future when I announce Round 2. 

For readability purposes however, I think your suggestion may be warranted, and I may reorder the list in the near future. For the immediate time however things will not be changed.

Your feedback is still greatly appreciated and I look forward to hearing more from you, and anyone else :)
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 16326 Posts
  • 18681 Reply Likes
Wow on the response. Hey, I saw how are you planning on bracketing this down from one Poll. A suggestion. You may need at least 2 and possibly 4, 35 choice polls. Take the top 15 from each to make a semi-final 2 polls or 1 poll, depending on the 2 or 4 initial choice. Then the top 10 from each for a final poll.
Just a thought!!!
Cheers

Ed
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 16326 Posts
  • 18681 Reply Likes
You could take the top 5 from each poll to have an all time best war picture in the end. 7X5=35.
35 is the maximum choices. I'm sure that Kyle will do this in the end. He just has not said so yet.
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Yep. Understood. Thanks for showing me, the pictures really helps so thanks for taking the time to provide them. As you can imagine this is a work in progress so I'll be evaluating and re-evaluating the best approach to take as time goes on, at least now however I have a little deeper knowledge of how polls can be 'narrowed down' - thank you. :)
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 16326 Posts
  • 18681 Reply Likes
Multiple polls are are not used often. Making them and keeping them simple is the key.
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Yeah, one of the issues I was struggling with regarding future development was the concept of scope. i.e. How to keep things simple, yet still provide enough facilitation for a large amount of titles. Thanks again for clearing things up some. You've earned a special mention in the thanks section and, as always, your feedback is appreciated. :-)
(Edited)
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 16326 Posts
  • 18681 Reply Likes
K:)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
I'm still weighing up my options on my own nominations here. There are a lot of bad movies out there, so many come to mind. I have a few I'm tossing around in my head and when I've decided on the three I'll add them to the list and announce it here. In the meantime - keep those suggestions rolling in! :)
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3429 Posts
  • 5737 Reply Likes
Richard, 
I forgot to let you know that you can watch RiffTraxes for free on Shout! Factory: http://www.shoutfactorytv.com/series/rifftrax
And there's some on Amazon Prime (you can sign for a 30 day free trial of that if you don't have it already)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Oh tyvm! I'll check that out :)

I'm a prime member but I'm in Australia so some of the content available is different for me, for example I can't watch IMDB's Freedive - but I'll check, thanks for the link :D
Photo of Stephen Atwood

Stephen Atwood

  • 1260 Posts
  • 1030 Reply Likes
I'll be back with my nominations. This is my wheelhouse. Terrible movies that make you eyes weep clotted blood and your soul begs you to self-extinguish into sweet sweet oblivion so you will never again experience such horrid filmmaking.
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
This is exactly the sort of thing I'm looking for, I'm looking forward to see what you decide on :D
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Thanks Dan, I'll take a look. 
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3438 Posts
  • 5747 Reply Likes
Tsar knows bad movies because he knows RiffTrax (or vice versa!)!  :D  Not claiming to be an expert, but I know, too!  Who can answer the following questions: (excluding Tsar, because he probably knows)

The film Monster Dog is from what year?

Who is the famous star in it?

Also in it is actor Emilio Linder, who was also in what classic MST3K film?

Bonus: The MST3K film is known best the title credited in the movie, but what is the film's "other" title?
(Edited)
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3438 Posts
  • 5747 Reply Likes
The Someone-Try-to-Answer-My-Trivia-and-Let-This-Go-Live Bump!
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Sorry, I've been ill over the last couple of days - I'll be back in a day or two (god willing) and re-ignite this discussion :)
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3289 Posts
  • 5528 Reply Likes
Image result for winnie the pooh get well gif
Photo of albstein

albstein

  • 717 Posts
  • 1394 Reply Likes
Get well soon!
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Thank you so much for your kind words. Feeling a bit better today, should be A-OK tomorrow :D

"I've always depended on the kindness of strangers" :p
(Edited)
Photo of riverotter

riverotter

  • 232 Posts
  • 382 Reply Likes
just a suggestion, but if you only included movies with a star rating under 4, it may be more apt for "worst movie of all time," heck maybe even only ratings under 3 stars!
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
I do appreciate the idea but yeah as Albstein said this poll is designed to be independent of IMDB ratings - they may come into play in later rounds if we need a tie-breaker or something, but for now, even something like The GodFather could appear on this list if someone thinks it should do so.
Photo of ElMo

ElMo

  • 3713 Posts
  • 4043 Reply Likes
even something like The GodFather could appear on this list if someone thinks it should do so.
Now, you lost me...

It's one thing to think the film isn't what it's all cracked up to be, or to think it's a manipulative film that glorifies the mob, let's even say, it's one thing to think that it's a bad movie, but the worst of all time? Even the most hardcore haters would concede a few good things about it... but I guess you were just making a point, but please don't spoil a good idea with the inclusion of a good film. There has to be objective element to validate the film's status as a bad movie, it takes a bad movie to be one of the worst, doesn't it?
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
This example was intentionally extreme, generally yes I'd like a pretty detailed explanation as to why someone nominated something like this film. This initial list is tentative and is there to serve the basis of the next round, which will allow people to vote on films already in the list - so in that regard even if someone did nominate an amazing film I feel it would be easily knocked out in later rounds. 

Hope that clarifies things a bit. :)
Photo of ElMo

ElMo

  • 3713 Posts
  • 4043 Reply Likes
Sometimes I just forget that the fact that The Godfather is taken for such extreme examples speaks for itself :) Out of all the movies, it had to be that one Peter Griffin didn't care about after all
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
That's a good point - it does speak for itself. :)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
I think by now most of the IMDB-GS community has had a chance to be exposed to the existence of this poll. I myself will be nominating my own entries over the next day or two. After that I'll be giving notice of the closure of nominations and subsequently the opening of round 2. Dates are still TBA but will be relatively soon, so if you are sitting on the fence now is the time to act :)
Photo of Stephen Atwood

Stephen Atwood

  • 1260 Posts
  • 1030 Reply Likes
I really want to suggest Nukie (1987) but I've only seen clips and ... to keep myself sane in my pursuit of creating this list of three? I will self-impose the restriction where if I haven't seen the whole film, it will be disqualified....

Keep in mind,  ALL of the worst movies are birthed from the Swamp of Sadness (via the Neverending Story). So, at a quantum mechanics level? It's impossible to generate a list of only three of the worst movies of all time. So? I decided to take the lazy meandering route and randomly spit out some cancerously bad films not already listed.
1. To Catch a Yeti (TV Movie 1995): Meat Loaf. That should be enough to qualify this entry. The Yeti in question is a furbyesque 2 foot tall puppet. Just terrible acting, script, and production design.
2. A Talking Cat!?! (2013) Pretentious and (de)moralizing.
3. Santa and the Ice Cream Bunny (1972): A Christmas movie for kids on a diet of acid and black tar heroin. Santa gets his bloody sled stuck in a sand of a beach. A wanky Easteresque rabbit and hippy kids are there to save the day.

Dishonorable mentions to...
Fun in Balloon Land
Rollergator (1996)

Personally, I have to disqualify any Neil Breen film as I've only seen clips and reviews. He is this century's Ed Wood. But with so sooo sooo sooo much more painful pretentiousness. Someone has to have nominated at least Fateful Findings.
(Edited)
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3438 Posts
  • 5747 Reply Likes
Wonderful, wonderful!  All very funny RiffTraxes and very awful movies.  :)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Thanks for the nominations, they have been added and credited. I really like the way you've written your explanations I enjoyed reading your post. :D
Photo of NDbportmanfan 1

NDbportmanfan 1

  • 672 Posts
  • 487 Reply Likes
Santa and the Ice Cream Bunny one of the movies even Rifftrax couldn't make enjoyable. 
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 2970 Posts
  • 3859 Reply Likes
I've seen Nukie (1987) in its entirety in late childhood/early teens. Never thought of it as a particularly bad movie as a) I've seen worse and b) derivation is not exactly a great thing, but it's not even the most derivative of the E.T. clone bunch. 

It's incredibly forgettable, though. 
Photo of NDbportmanfan 1

NDbportmanfan 1

  • 672 Posts
  • 487 Reply Likes
Every Worst Movie list is not complete without the mention of:

Dragonball Evolution (2009)

and I will also nominate Movie 43 (2013)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Thanks for nominating those 2, I've added them to the list and credited you for your nominations. Would you like to tell us why you've chosen those 2 in particular? (It's not compulsory but I find it interesting hearing peoples views). 

Thanks again :)
Photo of NDbportmanfan 1

NDbportmanfan 1

  • 672 Posts
  • 487 Reply Likes
For Dragonball, I would say this single movie changed my standard for watching movies forever. I never really had a high standard in movie quality up to that point as I remember saying one of my favorite movies was I, Robot (2004). But after watching the terrible special effects, writing, set design, acting (for the most part), adaption of source material and many more; I needed to cleanse my retinas. Really started watching more classic movies because of that utter mess.

Movie 43 is just the perfect example of star power meaning nothing without decent writing.
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Thanks for the explanation :) - I have a similar experience as far as standards go, mine evolved after I started to write reviews - the more I wrote the more critical I became and the more 'badness' I noticed. Before then I mostly loved everything (and hated a couple of things), now I feel I have a much wider range of evaluation levels for films, but I consequently am also more harshly opinionated than I used to be.
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Keep those nominations rollin' in! 

Also I'd like a small amount of feedback - I'm thinking of allowing everyone to nominate 2 more films (making 5 total per person) - do people want this ability? Or would you rather we stick to the 3/person?

I wasn't sure how much of a response we'd get for this list so I set it to 3 per person originally, just in case the list was overwhelming, currently we have 25 titles, which is still manageable, so I'm open to the idea of allowing a couple more movies from each of you. Let me know what you think.

Have an IMDBrilliant day!
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3340 Posts
  • 5611 Reply Likes
Okay, then: The Christmas Colt (2013)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
I'll add this one shortly, sorry for the delay here, been really busy! 
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Added and credited as requested :)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Nominations will close in a couple more days. Any further nominations are welcomed until that point in time. :)
Photo of Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd

  • 148 Posts
  • 310 Reply Likes
Nominations will close and Round 2 will start on Tuesday 14th May 2019. Coincidentally this is my Birthday, so that seems a fitting time to move things forward :)