after three revisions, my review has been declined three times. what am I missing?

  • 1
  • Question
  • Updated 4 months ago
  • Answered
the review itself is attached to this message as an image.

the word fuck appears muted, as in f*ck, and it is necessary in this specific case because the itself replaced the word by another one. so this cannot be removed from the review, it's part of it. 

am I being a target of biased judges that simply don't agree with my review?

Photo of heynando

heynando

  • 3 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
  • frustrated

Posted 4 months ago

  • 1
Photo of ACT_1

ACT_1

  • 2940 Posts
  • 2619 Reply Likes

after three revisions, my review has been declined three times. what am I missing?
by heynando
Joined on December 3, 2018
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/people/heynando
- - -

You ? ?

Heynando
IMDb member since February 2011
https://www.imdb.com/user/ur25169217/
https://www.imdb.com/user/ur25169217/ratings -  1,171 titles
https://www.imdb.com/user/ur25169217/reviews - 4 Reviews
- - -

Check status later ....

Battlestar Galactica  (2004-2009)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0407362/
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0407362/reference
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0407362/reviews  - 676 Reviews

.

Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 6244 Posts
  • 7586 Reply Likes
I see that the review submission guidelines oppose profanity, but they would probably be better oppose to unprofessional tones altogether and allow the sparingly-used explicit references to specific words.
Photo of ACT_1

ACT_1

  • 2940 Posts
  • 2619 Reply Likes

the review submission guidelines

IMDb is pleased to provide this forum for you to air your opinions
on your favorite (or not-so-favorite) movies and TV-series
What not to include:
• Profanity, obscenities, or spiteful remarks
in either the body or header of your review

- - -

Is there a difference
if the Reviewer says in my opinion this title is ______
and a reference quote from the title saying _____ ? ?

.

(Edited)
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 6244 Posts
  • 7586 Reply Likes
That question made me think of the documentary movie cataloged at https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6175670/.
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 6247 Posts
  • 7587 Reply Likes
I note that the submission reference number is 181119-130641-779004, transcribed for copy-and-paste ability. Well, "fuck" (even "f*ck") does count as profanity. I can see how it would be nice to quote the word every once in a while, but there is no need for "bat-shit crazy" (muted to "bat-sh*t crazy") which also counts as profanity.
Photo of heynando

heynando

  • 3 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
Talking about profanity is not the same as being profane. The context of the word fuck in the review is not profane, it is actually, and might I add clearly, explanatory, trying to convey through words how it felt watching the piece as it tried to replace the word fuck by a different one. How should I talk about the word fuck without referencing it?

Regarding the bat-shit-crazy part, I agree that it doesn't fit and it's over the top.  So I will revise it once again and remove this part. Especially after reading the actual meaning: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=batshit%20crazy


Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 6247 Posts
  • 7587 Reply Likes
Understandable. We should look forward to seeing what the IMDb site authorities have to express in response to the questions or problems at hand. Furthermore, it might even be better to not revise until that happens.
Photo of IMDbmember

IMDbmember

  • 61 Posts
  • 106 Reply Likes
Replacing it with "the F word" or something along those lines is an option.

Describing the word is another.  In a review where I wanted to quote vulgar slang from a movie, I ended up stating that IMDb censored the particular word that refers to one who masturbates.  Not ideal, but I understand the policy for generally-accepted vulgar terms.

On the other hand, I've had reviews declined for phrases and words such as "genitals" and "pawing at each other," which I think is ridiculous, but I digress as that doesn't seem to be the case here.

Ironically, it seems you're trying to do something similar to what your review criticizes by censoring the naughty word.
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 6247 Posts
  • 7587 Reply Likes
The bit about "so we must deduce it assumes its viewer has the brain the size of a potato" definitely needs to be dropped or rephrased, along with this notion of most being just as "crazy" as the story. Such a remarks are unnecessary belittling that have nothing to do with reviewing the content of television series.
Photo of heynando

heynando

  • 3 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
What's the point of a review if I can't genuinely convey my feelings to the reader? That is how I felt. That's how I interpreted it. Thus it is also how I should express it. 

Changing the narrative just to fit the politically correct bill feels a lot like tyranny. Feels a lot like washing the dirt before everyone sees it. Why not let the reader judge it by himself? Nobody likes to hear criticism that was bought, influenced or shaped by third parties. We are currently living in what could described as the fake-news Internet-age, yet the demand for truthful content has never been so high affecting literately all types of media. Still, you have the audacity to publicly ask me to change my monologue just to fit your agenda, because you don't like my tone or whatever the fuck. That's unacceptable in this day and age.

So, No sir. You don't get to tell me what I should call as crazy or not. That is disgusting. That is pure tyranny. The word crazy has meaning and it would be crazy if it didn't exist and it is even crazier to not be able to use it in a simple public monologue piece. See what there? 

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/crazy

 Crazy is an adjective with multiple meanings. According to Oxford one of those is: (of an angle) appearing absurdly out of place or unlikely. So in the specific case of my review it does fit bill because that's exactly what I wanted to convey.

Origin
Late 16th century (in sense ‘full of cracks’): from craze + -y.
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 6247 Posts
  • 7587 Reply Likes
Listen, heynando. If you do not like IMDb's rules, then you are free to post your review elsewhere. True, I'm not your boss. On the other hand, you are guaranteed to not be able to force IMDb to publish something that it does not want to publish. For the record, I never stated that I did not like your words. That is an inaccurate inference on your part.