Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor.

  • 1
  • Question
  • Updated 2 months ago
  • Answered
The staff at IMDb has recently ruled that they believed that an actresses name page data to be factual and denied a request for removal.
Her page: https://m.imdb.com/name/nm8571250/?re...
Topic for request for removal.
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/how-can-i-delete-a-page-i-m-not-an-actor-never
Result was request denied.
Same topic was re-posted here
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/delete-account-and-my-post-was-closed
Result was denied again.
However, a user https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/people/trivia_6ho9x4eonfowh has decided that Staff is wrong and has stated his intention to make a submission for removal of said credits believing that staff is more often than not wrong in its decisions.
Submissions to this page https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8571250/?ref_=fn_al_nm_0 should be watched for attempted alteration by what may be considered a trusted contributor.





Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18836 Posts
  • 21334 Reply Likes

Posted 2 months ago

  • 1
Photo of Leigh

Leigh

  • 24 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
Are you seriously posting about my posts? Who the hell made you king?!
Photo of Leigh

Leigh

  • 24 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
This whole thing is BEYOND absurd! I’m not an actress, I had no credits in those things (wasn’t even at the second one) and now some strange ass people are going to tell me that they know what I did and I don’t?
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18836 Posts
  • 21334 Reply Likes
Look this is my post. You came here to harass. Not I.
If you do not care, then why are you here?
And if you do not care, then what exactly is your motive in the first place?
I just reply with facts, data, and policy.
You reply with what?
Insults.
Please discontinue.
Thanks
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
All posts are public and not 'owned' by anyone. Just in case you don't know that.
But then I would have expected noting less from you to think you 'owned' it.
Nope, it's you who is harassing me. Sorry -- sad but true.
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
You can stop relying now.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18836 Posts
  • 21334 Reply Likes
.
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
...... 6
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18836 Posts
  • 21334 Reply Likes
Leigh and Trivia. If I keep digging I will find what I'm looking for. Leigh is a big fan of Luke Bryan. This is obvious after seeing no less than 25+ links between her name and Bryan. Leigh is/was a staff reporter. The first credit was 18 years ago in 2001. Why complain now? And her saying that she has had nothing to do with the credits are totally misleading. This is just one of the many photos I found. It was taken by Leigh as can be seen in the caption in the bottom right. The credits are valid. Trivia if you want to argue the credit for a change to Self uncredited then by all means do so. But she most likely was seen on or near a stage in the titles described due to her job as a reporter/photographer for a news outlet in Georgia.
http://gm5-gaweb.newscyclecloud.com/photogallery/GA/20130410/PHOTOGALLERY/304109928/PH/1






Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18836 Posts
  • 21334 Reply Likes




She has been covering Luke for years. Her image being caught on screen during these videos is highly likely as photographers and reporters are backstage and in some case stage center front taking stills.
Either one of you care to dispute these facts.
Yes I am not an employee.
Yes I am pushy.
But I AM thorough.
Yes I back staff when they make a decision.
They likely did the same research I did and came to the same conclusion I did.
Leigh, IMDb is not going to change their collective minds after seeing this, in case they did not find what I have and are now seeing it. Your Job makes you a public person. Not a Fan/Not a fan as you claim.
Trivia, please do better here in the future.
Thanks
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18836 Posts
  • 21334 Reply Likes
I haven't seen the titles on the page for Leigh Hancock
Then why are you commenting on this. Please thoroughly read any topic before commenting. Otherwise, you are talking out of context.

Always? Even when you think another decision would be better? If so, what does that help anyone?

Yes, always! It is not my sandbox. It is IMDb's sandbox. And sorry to inform you, but there decisions are based on sound logic. If you disagree, then you need to evaluate the concept of organizational structure. There are those in charge that are the Chiefs. And the rest of us are the Indians. The Boss is always right. Any time you disagree with the Boss. You only have 2 choices. Comply or Quit, and the 3rd option when you won't comply or quit. You get fired.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18836 Posts
  • 21334 Reply Likes
T101
I need not comment on anything further as you are clearly agitated. I don't reply to persons after they become outrageous in their replies.
It is counterproductive.
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Commander Ed Jones, I am once again getting under your skin and you are compelled to write to me. You have this uncontrollable desire to keep on writing to me and making reports about me.
Write another long detailed report about me, go on, do another one. I'll collect them.

..... dot dot dot....LOL
Photo of Marco

Marco

  • 1286 Posts
  • 1635 Reply Likes
I haven't seen the titles on the page for Leigh Hancock

Then why are you commenting on this.

Have you seen the titles?

Yes, always! It is not my sandbox. It is IMDb's sandbox.

So? Because it is their sandbox you are not allowed to disagree with them?

And sorry to inform you, but there decisions are based on sound logic.

That's an opinion. I personally feel most of IMDb's decisions are based on sound logic, but not all of them. I feel some aren't.

If you disagree, then you need to evaluate the concept of organizational structure.

No, I don't. I can simply state I disagree for reason A or B or whatever. I understand the concept of organizational structure. The structure has room for people to state they don't agree with something.

There are those in charge that are the Chiefs. And the rest of us are the Indians. The Boss is always right.

You do realize we're not in China or something here? IMDb (sometimes) listens to contributors and the like and changes or updates their policy.

Any time you disagree with the Boss. You only have 2 choices. Comply or Quit, and the 3rd option when you won't comply or quit. You get fired.

How would I get fired if I don't work for IMDb? How would that work exactly? Apart from that, IMDb doesn't mind that people don't fully agree with every part of their policy.



@trivia: I advice you not to respond to Ed because I don't think it will do you any good.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18836 Posts
  • 21334 Reply Likes
Marco?
Now who is fixed and unmovable?
Oh.
Marco is.
Photo of Leigh

Leigh

  • 24 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
You are a complete idiot and stalker.

Luke Bryan wasn’t even a recording artist in 2001 or a singer. And that’s not him in the photo!

You are being reported.
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 3250 Posts
  • 4341 Reply Likes
Leigh, searching for a person on the Internet is not stalking per se if person came where you are and tries actively to delete information. It's fact checking. It might go on several detours (inevitably considering you're not explaining the situation in detail nor providing sufficient proofs). It's like calling people stalkers for checking out your social media when you mentioned it numerous times, to be honest. You're not just going somewhere asking to delete the information witout expecting people o try and re-check. 

Moreover, please watch your language. Fewer people call other people idiots there and disproprtionate number of them are trying to get their proven, at times credited listings deleted. 
Photo of Leigh

Leigh

  • 24 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
Well sorry, but I came on here looking for help by an IMDB PERSON, but an ass-kisser that sits on their computer all day.

And until just now, I didn’t say anything inappropriate.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18836 Posts
  • 21334 Reply Likes
Photo of Leigh

Leigh

  • 24 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
Truth hurts. I came on here looking for help, not for people to tell me what I did in my past my.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18836 Posts
  • 21334 Reply Likes
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
This is for Ed Jones -- super sleuth extraordinaire.
Do you know these are the same person.
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm9650640/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2470164


Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 3250 Posts
  • 4341 Reply Likes
Unrelated subject.

Please reference the new conversation here: Same person
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18836 Posts
  • 21334 Reply Likes
Submission made based on collected data on this and the other two topics listed above.
Acting as a public figure performing her duties as a Photojournalist.
Contribution #191111-030326-648000



(Edited)
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
.... dot dot dot
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18836 Posts
  • 21334 Reply Likes
You are not doing yourself any good here.
Your behavior will likely result in a reaction by staff.
Again.Please be civil.

Posting LOL's at me is far from civil.
I have given you this last courtesy reply.
But I will not be bated into any debate by you, nor will any questions be addressed.
You are what you are.
I need not point it out.
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
It was you Ed Jones who started the conversation. Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor. Not me.... So:
Does this mean there is no Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor? Apart from you? 
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
It is a civil question, you find you can't answer it.
It was you Ed Jones who started the conversation. Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor. Not me.... So:
Does this mean there is no Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor? Apart from you? 
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18836 Posts
  • 21334 Reply Likes
What part of "I will not be bated into any debate by you, nor will any questions be addressed" do you not comprehend?
Please act in a civil manor.
If you reply once more that is pretty much proof that what I have stated about you is fact.
This is the last courtesy I am extending here.
No more replies.
But if you must.....Type all to yourself to your hearts content.
Bye.
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
The heading of this conversation is inaccurate.
As it was not me but Ed Jones who Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor.

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.