Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor.

  • 1
  • Question
  • Updated 2 months ago
  • Answered
The staff at IMDb has recently ruled that they believed that an actresses name page data to be factual and denied a request for removal.
Her page: https://m.imdb.com/name/nm8571250/?re...
Topic for request for removal.
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/how-can-i-delete-a-page-i-m-not-an-actor-never
Result was request denied.
Same topic was re-posted here
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/delete-account-and-my-post-was-closed
Result was denied again.
However, a user https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/people/trivia_6ho9x4eonfowh has decided that Staff is wrong and has stated his intention to make a submission for removal of said credits believing that staff is more often than not wrong in its decisions.
Submissions to this page https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8571250/?ref_=fn_al_nm_0 should be watched for attempted alteration by what may be considered a trusted contributor.





Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes

Posted 2 months ago

  • 1
Photo of Leigh

Leigh

  • 24 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
Are you seriously posting about my posts? Who the hell made you king?!
Photo of Leigh

Leigh

  • 24 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
This whole thing is BEYOND absurd! I’m not an actress, I had no credits in those things (wasn’t even at the second one) and now some strange ass people are going to tell me that they know what I did and I don’t?
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
This post is not about you.
Please stay on point on your problems on your posts.
This is about the user "Trivia", not you. You are the example. Not the issue.
Thanks

It is about that user and his attempts to circumvent a decision made by staff.
That's all this is about
(Edited)
Photo of Leigh

Leigh

  • 24 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
That person was atleast being supportive. You however came in all snooty and what are you doing now? Tattling you’re the teacher? You don’t even work for IMDB.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
I was being a realist. Would you rather that I be supportive by lying?
That is not support. That is the opposite.
Telling you what you want to hear is a disservice to the concept here.
He is being disruptive by offering a solution when he solution is to try and go around the staffs decision by way of submission, hoping that he will catch an editor that won't question his submission based on his accuracy rate.
I do not and he does not have the final say. Staff does.
To try and deceive the system is not acceptable.
And yes I don't work here.
You Don't
He Does not.
Staff does. It is their database. Not yours.
They decide.
Not I.
Not You.
Not "Trivia"
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Hey there Leigh.
Let it go, there is no point arguing with this person who is only a part time volunteer. He can offer nothing apart from trying to bolster this self esteem. He needs a hat and a uniform to go with his inflated ego.
So, just wait and let us see what develops. It may take a while so be patient.
Do not reply to him anymore he "gets off on it".
(Edited)
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
Trivia, those types of comments are unnecessary and are inflammatory in nature.
Please refrain saying I have low self esteem, an inflated ego, or that I "Get Off" on it. That is far from the truth.
And please do not violate the T.O.S.

And if I'm part time, you amount to no time. Your comments here are meant solely to inflame.

https://getsatisfaction.com/corp/terms-of-service/

1. ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS OF SERVICE

1.1 Welcome to Get Satisfaction, Inc. ("we" "us" "our" or "Get Satisfaction").

1.2 Your use of any of Get Satisfaction's Web sites, services, application programming interfaces ("APIs") or software (collectively, the "Get Satisfaction Service") is subject to these terms of service (the "Terms of Service") in effect at the time of your use. Get Satisfaction reserves the right to update and change these Terms of Service from time to time without notice or acceptance by you, so please check this page frequently for updates and changes. However, changes made to these Terms of Service will not apply to you to the extent that (i) the changes concern matters which are the subject of an actual dispute between you and Get Satisfaction as of the date the changes take effect and (ii) Get Satisfaction has actual notice of the dispute as of the date the changes take effect.

1.4 Your use of the Get Satisfaction Service is also subject to the Get Satisfaction Community Guidelines in effect at the time of your use, which are incorporated herein as though set forth in full. You can review the most current version of the Get Satisfaction Community Guidelines.


4. CODE OF CONDUCT

4.1 Get Satisfaction has the right, but not the obligation, to remove or block Content from the Get Satisfaction Service that it determines in its sole discretion to be in violation of these Terms of Service, to be unlawful, offensive, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene or otherwise objectionable, that violates any party's intellectual property or that is detrimental to the quality or intended spirit of the Get Satisfaction Service. Get Satisfaction also has the right, but not the obligation, to limit or revoke the use privileges of the account of anyone who posts such Content or engages in such behavior.

4.2.3 Use of derogatory, discriminatory or excessively graphic language.

4.2.4 Providing information that is false, misleading or inaccurate.

4.2.8 Sending unwanted messages to other users (aka "spam").


Please decease violating the policies stated above.


Let Staff deal with the issue presented.


Now if you want to talk about your  intentions to make a submission to remove the credits in question against staffs ruling, then by all means reply.

But if you intend to keep insulting me. STOP.

Thank you.

Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Look Ed Jones, you can keep on trying to be the internet policeman and the one 'in charge' but no ones cares.
You can do what you like to me, post as many rules as you like. So, whatever.
Keep trying to 'get me'. Good luck and have fun.
I can see I'm getting under your skin and annoying you by not 'complying' to your demands. But who cares eh!
(Edited)
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
You can stop replying now.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
Read below.
You are backing the wrong horse.
Back staffs decisions from now on please.
Thanks
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Does that mean you will stop harassing me.
Not that I really care.
(Edited)
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
Look this is my post. You came here to harass. Not I.
If you do not care, then why are you here?
And if you do not care, then what exactly is your motive in the first place?
I just reply with facts, data, and policy.
You reply with what?
Insults.
Please discontinue.
Thanks
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
All posts are public and not 'owned' by anyone. Just in case you don't know that.
But then I would have expected noting less from you to think you 'owned' it.
Nope, it's you who is harassing me. Sorry -- sad but true.
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
You can stop relying now.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
.
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
...... 6
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
Leigh and Trivia. If I keep digging I will find what I'm looking for. Leigh is a big fan of Luke Bryan. This is obvious after seeing no less than 25+ links between her name and Bryan. Leigh is/was a staff reporter. The first credit was 18 years ago in 2001. Why complain now? And her saying that she has had nothing to do with the credits are totally misleading. This is just one of the many photos I found. It was taken by Leigh as can be seen in the caption in the bottom right. The credits are valid. Trivia if you want to argue the credit for a change to Self uncredited then by all means do so. But she most likely was seen on or near a stage in the titles described due to her job as a reporter/photographer for a news outlet in Georgia.
http://gm5-gaweb.newscyclecloud.com/photogallery/GA/20130410/PHOTOGALLERY/304109928/PH/1






Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes




She has been covering Luke for years. Her image being caught on screen during these videos is highly likely as photographers and reporters are backstage and in some case stage center front taking stills.
Either one of you care to dispute these facts.
Yes I am not an employee.
Yes I am pushy.
But I AM thorough.
Yes I back staff when they make a decision.
They likely did the same research I did and came to the same conclusion I did.
Leigh, IMDb is not going to change their collective minds after seeing this, in case they did not find what I have and are now seeing it. Your Job makes you a public person. Not a Fan/Not a fan as you claim.
Trivia, please do better here in the future.
Thanks
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Trivia, please do better here in the future.
LOL.... who cares what you say. 

Ed Jones, please do better here in the future.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
Silly. I have a track record. You however do not.
You again are violating the T.O.S.
I need not reply further. You have been outed.
(Edited)
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
More harassment from Ed Jones.
You can stop replying now.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
.
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Post some more POS it seems to get you in a state of excitement.
Stop harassing me Ed Jones. 
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
..... LOL 5 of them
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
.
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
....... 7
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Every dot you leave is a sign of harassment from you.
I know they are designed to stop removal of comments. But don't worry Ed Jones I will not remove anything.
So, you have to think of another way of harassing me....LOL
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
How about if I tell you I have a train controllers hat. Would you like to borrow it?..... LOL.
It has a big badge on the front, ideal for you...... LOL
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
.... LOL
Photo of Leigh

Leigh

  • 24 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
Yes I will dispute.

1. Luke was a college student and not a recording artist in 2001.
2. The first photo is Thomas Rhett not Luke.
3. The second photo is not from the recording that is a credit. It’s from two years before and in another town.

Regardless of these facts, if I was not on camera or had a credit, I should not have an IMDb page you raging insult to humans.
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 3259 Posts
  • 4373 Reply Likes
Leigh, again, watch your language. 
Photo of Marco

Marco

  • 1291 Posts
  • 1644 Reply Likes
She has been covering Luke for years. Her image being caught on screen during these videos is highly likely as photographers and reporters are backstage and in some case stage center front taking stills.
I haven't seen the titles on the page for Leigh Hancock, so I can't say whether or not she should have an IMDb page. There are only a few things that count regarding this situation. Was she in the titles, was she credited or not on these titles and are the titles eligible to be on IMDb? I don't know the answers to these questions, but these are the only questions that need an answer. You are absolutely free to look all over the internet for whatever it is you where trying to find, but I find it a tad bit childish.
Yes I back staff when they make a decision.
Always? Even when you think another decision would be better? If so, what does that help anyone?
Photo of Marco

Marco

  • 1291 Posts
  • 1644 Reply Likes
She has been covering Luke for years. Her image being caught on screen during these videos is highly likely as photographers and reporters are backstage and in some case stage center front taking stills.
I haven't seen the titles on the page for Leigh Hancock, so I can't say whether or not she should have an IMDb page. There are only a few things that count regarding this situation. Was she in the titles, was she credited or not on these titles and are the titles eligible to be on IMDb? I don't know the answers to these questions, but these are the only questions that need an answer. You are absolutely free to look all over the internet for whatever it is you where trying to find, but I find it a tad bit childish.
Yes I back staff when they make a decision.
Always? Even when you think another decision would be better? If so, what does that help anyone?
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Yes correct Marco -- all a bit childish. And I know of hundreds of incorrect data that the staff backed as correct.
Have to be careful here or Commander Ed Jones will write another long report about me...LOL
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
...... dot, dot dot.....LOL
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
I haven't seen the titles on the page for Leigh Hancock
Then why are you commenting on this. Please thoroughly read any topic before commenting. Otherwise, you are talking out of context.

Always? Even when you think another decision would be better? If so, what does that help anyone?

Yes, always! It is not my sandbox. It is IMDb's sandbox. And sorry to inform you, but there decisions are based on sound logic. If you disagree, then you need to evaluate the concept of organizational structure. There are those in charge that are the Chiefs. And the rest of us are the Indians. The Boss is always right. Any time you disagree with the Boss. You only have 2 choices. Comply or Quit, and the 3rd option when you won't comply or quit. You get fired.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
T101
I need not comment on anything further as you are clearly agitated. I don't reply to persons after they become outrageous in their replies.
It is counterproductive.
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Commander Ed Jones, I am once again getting under your skin and you are compelled to write to me. You have this uncontrollable desire to keep on writing to me and making reports about me.
Write another long detailed report about me, go on, do another one. I'll collect them.

..... dot dot dot....LOL
Photo of Marco

Marco

  • 1291 Posts
  • 1644 Reply Likes
I haven't seen the titles on the page for Leigh Hancock

Then why are you commenting on this.

Have you seen the titles?

Yes, always! It is not my sandbox. It is IMDb's sandbox.

So? Because it is their sandbox you are not allowed to disagree with them?

And sorry to inform you, but there decisions are based on sound logic.

That's an opinion. I personally feel most of IMDb's decisions are based on sound logic, but not all of them. I feel some aren't.

If you disagree, then you need to evaluate the concept of organizational structure.

No, I don't. I can simply state I disagree for reason A or B or whatever. I understand the concept of organizational structure. The structure has room for people to state they don't agree with something.

There are those in charge that are the Chiefs. And the rest of us are the Indians. The Boss is always right.

You do realize we're not in China or something here? IMDb (sometimes) listens to contributors and the like and changes or updates their policy.

Any time you disagree with the Boss. You only have 2 choices. Comply or Quit, and the 3rd option when you won't comply or quit. You get fired.

How would I get fired if I don't work for IMDb? How would that work exactly? Apart from that, IMDb doesn't mind that people don't fully agree with every part of their policy.



@trivia: I advice you not to respond to Ed because I don't think it will do you any good.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
Marco?
Now who is fixed and unmovable?
Oh.
Marco is.
Photo of Leigh

Leigh

  • 24 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
You are a complete idiot and stalker.

Luke Bryan wasn’t even a recording artist in 2001 or a singer. And that’s not him in the photo!

You are being reported.
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 3259 Posts
  • 4373 Reply Likes
Leigh, searching for a person on the Internet is not stalking per se if person came where you are and tries actively to delete information. It's fact checking. It might go on several detours (inevitably considering you're not explaining the situation in detail nor providing sufficient proofs). It's like calling people stalkers for checking out your social media when you mentioned it numerous times, to be honest. You're not just going somewhere asking to delete the information witout expecting people o try and re-check. 

Moreover, please watch your language. Fewer people call other people idiots there and disproprtionate number of them are trying to get their proven, at times credited listings deleted. 
Photo of Leigh

Leigh

  • 24 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
Well sorry, but I came on here looking for help by an IMDB PERSON, but an ass-kisser that sits on their computer all day.

And until just now, I didn’t say anything inappropriate.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
Photo of Leigh

Leigh

  • 24 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
Truth hurts. I came on here looking for help, not for people to tell me what I did in my past my.
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
This is for Ed Jones -- super sleuth extraordinaire.
Do you know these are the same person.
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm9650640/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2470164


Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 3259 Posts
  • 4373 Reply Likes
Unrelated subject.

Please reference the new conversation here: Same person
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
Submission made based on collected data on this and the other two topics listed above.
Acting as a public figure performing her duties as a Photojournalist.
Contribution #191111-030326-648000



(Edited)
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Does this mean there is no Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor? Apart from you? ...LOL
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Oh I forgot, you are a contributor...LOL

.... dot dot dot
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
Please cease this diatribe and act in a civil manor.
Will not reply further to you as you have proven to be nothing more than an agitator.
(Edited)
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
Now listen up Commander Ed Jones, that was a civil question.
Does this mean there is no Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor? Apart from you? 
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
.
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
It was you Ed Jones who started the conversation. Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor. Not me.... So:
Does this mean there is no Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor? Apart from you? 
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
...dot dot dot
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
.
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
...dot dot dot
You are still harassing me with dots.
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
.... dot dot dot
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
You are not doing yourself any good here.
Your behavior will likely result in a reaction by staff.
Again.Please be civil.

Posting LOL's at me is far from civil.
I have given you this last courtesy reply.
But I will not be bated into any debate by you, nor will any questions be addressed.
You are what you are.
I need not point it out.
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
It was you Ed Jones who started the conversation. Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor. Not me.... So:
Does this mean there is no Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor? Apart from you? 
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
It is a civil question, you find you can't answer it.
It was you Ed Jones who started the conversation. Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor. Not me.... So:
Does this mean there is no Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor? Apart from you? 
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 18978 Posts
  • 21504 Reply Likes
What part of "I will not be bated into any debate by you, nor will any questions be addressed" do you not comprehend?
Please act in a civil manor.
If you reply once more that is pretty much proof that what I have stated about you is fact.
This is the last courtesy I am extending here.
No more replies.
But if you must.....Type all to yourself to your hearts content.
Bye.
Photo of trivia101

trivia101

  • 53 Posts
  • 7 Reply Likes
The heading of this conversation is inaccurate.
As it was not me but Ed Jones who Attempted manipulation of credits by a contributor.

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.