Submission 200718-101429-757000
An 82 second parody/skit video using all archive footage. Three people credited, first two were accepted, the third was declined. I gave timecoded links to where their credit appeared for all three.
I'm noticing a trend with these videos. If you're a no-name YouTuber, the credit gets accepted no problem. But anyone more recognisable in the mainstream seems to lag in 'pending' for a bit, then gets declined. Is this going to to be another put it in Trivia thing? I thought as it wasn't uncredited this time it would be more straightforward, but more fool me I guess.
An 82 second parody/skit video using all archive footage. Three people credited, first two were accepted, the third was declined. I gave timecoded links to where their credit appeared for all three.
I'm noticing a trend with these videos. If you're a no-name YouTuber, the credit gets accepted no problem. But anyone more recognisable in the mainstream seems to lag in 'pending' for a bit, then gets declined. Is this going to to be another put it in Trivia thing? I thought as it wasn't uncredited this time it would be more straightforward, but more fool me I guess.
Be the first to post a reply!

