Many modern television programmes don't have on-screen credits and instead say something like "For full credits, go to our website", with the full credits being listed on the official website. It seems misleading to have to credit everyone (including producers, directors, editors, etc.) as uncredited if they are actually credited in the official place the credits are supposed to be. The on-screen rule seems outdated. It also looks silly and unnecessary to have everyone on the IMDb cast/crew list with "(uncredited)" next to their name. Additionally, it means the credits on the individuals' IMDb pages look less important than they are actually are. For example, if someone is an assistant editor in television, but all their credits on their page are "uncredited", it makes them look like they're not actually a proper assistant editor.



Matt
And here is the credits list on the website: https://tenplay.com.au/channel-ten/the-bachelor/credits
Matt
Martin
In that case, the definitive credits (in terms of completeness and order of cast) should be taken from the original programme-maker's on-screen credits.
If you've seen it on British shows when they are shown in Australia, then I think it is almost certainly a change made by the Australian broadcaster, because I've never seen it on a British programme when it is shown here in Britain.
Matt
My comment on British shows was referring to shows I've seen on British television/catch-up, though that's just my memory and I could be wrong.