Death in sharknado 6 | Credit

  • 1
  • Problem
  • Updated 1 year ago
  • Not a Problem
Hello! --- IMDb update receipt #180821-163959-580000

I'm an actor/writer, and I did work on Sharknado 6 as a Stand-In. I also did a stunt with stunt coordinator/my friend Alex, to get eaten in the face by a shark on the beach. :)

I woke up today to see they had credited my ACTING page with a role name that just says "Background" - it looks weird and isn't that against IMDb standards? I was happy to provide atmosphere for them but Background is not a role and it looks strange with real story work. 

The submitted receipt listed above is me suggesting they change it to "Guy" because I am so confused by this. I am flattered and I love their crew, but if they want to list my credit it has to be something like "Shark Victim" because I was eaten in the face, or "Guy on Beach" -- really anything that is a legitimate story-related term.


Someone please advise? You can see what they did here: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1738243/ 
Thanks!

George Loomis





Photo of George Loomis

George Loomis

  • 126 Posts
  • 65 Reply Likes

Posted 1 year ago

  • 1
Photo of ljdoncel

ljdoncel, Champion

  • 842 Posts
  • 1784 Reply Likes
Hi, George:

I haven't seen The Last Sharknado: It's About Time (2018) yet, but during last July I audited the on-screen credits of the first five films of the franchise. If, as I suspect, this last installment follows the same pattern as the rest, you're probably billed under the caption Background.

I agree that this may look weird, uninformative or misleading, but listing "character names as they appear in on-screen credits" is precisely in accordance with IMDb standards.

Cheers!
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 3067 Posts
  • 4016 Reply Likes
They are at the very end of credits, somewhere near Special Thanks. When something like that happens it usually gets listed in Miscellaneous Crew, although there are no clear rules on that. 

One example is Evil Dead (2013): while all previous installements of the franchise got "fake shemps" listed in the cast section, in this case they were added to miscellaneous crew, as their credits were buried midway through the credits, long after the cast (despite in this case fake shemps actually were bit part actors with rather memorable role). I'm still glad they are listed at all, because I tried to add them for years. In the beginning of this year I took extra mile and also re-checked end credits. It turned out, IMDb listings lacked dozens of names.  
Photo of George Loomis

George Loomis

  • 126 Posts
  • 65 Reply Likes
Thanks for your reply @ljdoncel — what would you recommend I do? 1) As mentioned I was a Stand-In 2) per your own words “Character names as they appear in onscreen credits” - Background is not a character name, it’s a job. So it doesn’t conform to standards. Conforming to standards would require a character name. Background is not a character name.

Please let me know what you think I should do...I’m pretty sure I can’t leave it in my acting credits just because it looks weird. Personally I think it’s really funny, but I doubt I can keep it.
I love the director of this film and I’m unsure why he does this on all these... Please let me know what you’d advise, and thank you!
Photo of ljdoncel

ljdoncel, Champion

  • 842 Posts
  • 1784 Reply Likes
Hi, George:
Background is not a character name, it’s a job. So it doesn’t conform to standards.
As Adrian states below, cast guide explicitly covers the instances in which actors are identified as Background in the on-screen credits, so it does conform to the site's standards. By now, you have succeeded in changing the character name to Guy (be careful!), but as soon as some contributor checks the on-screen credits (like Adrian did in the first place) and is able to provide a screenshot...

...it will probably be reverted to Background soon.
(I've numbered the names in a hurry, so if I ever submit the missing credits I'll have to re-check for duplicates).

I agree that (sadly) the aforementioned rule prevents you from giving a more detailed description of your role in the character name field. Adrian's idea (Background/Man Eaten by Shark) is interesting, but I wouldn't recommend it because the slash would imply that you played two different roles. Jeorj's alternative is great (IMO), and I think that could be incorporated into the guides, so here's my humble proposal for consideration by IMDb staff and fellow contributors:
If several actors are billed on screen under a common generic "background" caption (e.g. Background, Extras...) and have no character names listed, the generic header can be followed by a hyphen and a short description of their role (e.g. Background - Man Eaten by Shark).
(someone please rephrase it in proper English... )


George, in the meantime, I suggest that you add a trivia item in your name page explaining what you did in the film; something like: "In [link=tt8031422] he did a stunt with stunt coordinator [link=nm2317701] to get eaten in the face by a shark on the beach."
I’m pretty sure I can’t leave it in my acting credits just because it looks weird. Personally I think it’s really funny, but I doubt I can keep it
Be grateful that Mr. Ferrante takes everybody into consideration (I agree with Nikolay)... You could regret not having been credited in a future...

(Edited)
Photo of George Loomis

George Loomis

  • 126 Posts
  • 65 Reply Likes
Thank you! As mentioned, I like Anthony Ferrante very much, and I'm not sure who is behind doing that. I changed it to Guy out of sheer confusion yesterday morning. I'm going to leave it that way until I see the film. Once again, thanks!
Photo of George Loomis

George Loomis

  • 126 Posts
  • 65 Reply Likes
And yes exactly @ljdoncel -- Anthony Ferrante is a terrific guy.
Photo of Adrian

Adrian, Champion

  • 1259 Posts
  • 1498 Reply Likes
Hey George, 

I'm the guy that added your credit to Sharknado 6. You are listed in the section called background. This conforms to IMDb standards as that is the way you are credited and Background is acceptable if that is how it appears on screen.
Photo of George Loomis

George Loomis

  • 126 Posts
  • 65 Reply Likes
It inherently doesn’t conform to IMDb standards because it’s not a character name — that’s not IMDb’s fault though! This situation is hilarious
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 3014 Posts
  • 3928 Reply Likes
Weird acting credits happen. :)
Photo of Adrian

Adrian, Champion

  • 1242 Posts
  • 1479 Reply Likes
It does conform to IMDb's standards. Per the cast guide:

We will accept "background" or "extra" if that's how the credit appears on screen, but "background", "extra" or "bit-part" will not be accepted as a character name on the title if the role does not receive an on-screen credit.
This is the only reason I added it. I'm guessing you can ammend the credit to something like "Background/Man Eaten by Shark". I know credits are supposed to be as shown on screen but sometimes an extra definition isn't harmful.
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 7265 Posts
  • 9474 Reply Likes
It would be a hyphen instead of a slash.
Photo of George Loomis

George Loomis

  • 126 Posts
  • 65 Reply Likes
Thanks guys!
Photo of George Loomis

George Loomis

  • 126 Posts
  • 65 Reply Likes
Haha gentlemen thank you for your time on this. I believe I have a solution. This will go down as the most hilarious message board chain I’ve ever been involved in.