Archived and Closed
This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies and is no longer visible to community members. The community moderator provided the following reason for archiving: Old thread
Many of those women are not "chocolate"... Why call an article "Beautiful Chocolate/Brown/Dark-skinned Queens!" and have 1/3 of the women pictured who are not even NEAR chocolate or dark-skinned in completion? Some of those women don't even look African American (or scientifically, "Negroid") - although that isn't saying they aren't. Its not insulting to categorize and recognize different skin tones within the Black race - but it is insulting to lump them all together as if you could care less about the difference. Basically we have Dark-skinned, Brown-skin (ye we call it that), and Light-skinned. Dark is chocolate, Brown is Caramel, Light is Blonde-wood... Recognize the difference and fix your article!


