Found decent-sized error in a movie and it is still not been published

  • 1
  • Problem
  • Updated 5 months ago
  • Solved
I thought that I had found a decent-sized error in a movie and it is still not been published. It is not a goof in the technical sense but it is an issue with it nonetheless. I submitted it on August 24th. How does one find out why or what the reason is why it  was not applied?
Photo of Brad Twersky

Brad Twersky

  • 9 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes

Posted 5 months ago

  • 1
Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 6571 Posts
  • 8114 Reply Likes
Photo of Fayde Dnamron

Fayde Dnamron

  • 8 Posts
  • 8 Reply Likes
What type of error are you referring to?
Photo of Vincent Fournols

Vincent Fournols

  • 2901 Posts
  • 4837 Reply Likes
... and what movie are you precisely referring to?
Photo of Brad Twersky

Brad Twersky

  • 9 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
Photo of Brad Twersky

Brad Twersky

  • 9 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
The error is hard to find a spot for. But the movie is The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
Photo of Brad Twersky

Brad Twersky

  • 9 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
The error is hard to describe but, if you have watched the movie, there are parts where Lisbeth needs her allowance and the social worker (who rapes her) is going over her actual work day. If she only sorts mail and makes coffee, how is she getting letters of reference from her PI firm as an investigator to investigate? I mean the whole movie starts off with the owner saying how valuable she is, yet she needs allowance to buy things...How does one submit an error like this? 
Photo of Brad Twersky

Brad Twersky

  • 9 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
The problem is that the movie only works because she doesn't have money, yet she also has to have valuable skills that Mikhail Blomquist needs to solve these murders
Photo of Vincent Fournols

Vincent Fournols

  • 2901 Posts
  • 4837 Reply Likes
Hi Brad,

When it comes to the actual way of submitting goofs and inconsistencies to IMDb, I would say what you describe would falls under the "Miscellaneous" category.

Which of the two versions are you specifically referring to: the US one or the original Swedish one? Because there may be script differences between them both.

I have seen only the Swedish one, upon its release in 2009, and I do not recall what you describe. I would be surprised that the screenplay leaves such a loophole, and that this inconsistency is not covered by some plot justification. But you probably know better and more accurately with a much fresher memory than mine :)

Photo of Jeorj Euler

Jeorj Euler

  • 6571 Posts
  • 8114 Reply Likes
Miscellaneous? But what about "plot hole"?
Photo of Vincent Fournols

Vincent Fournols

  • 2901 Posts
  • 4837 Reply Likes
My bad, I did not spot it. Yes, that is a relevant one.
Photo of Brad Twersky

Brad Twersky

  • 9 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
Hi Vince. I'm talking about the U.S. version. I highly recommend you watch it. Amazing movie that I had to watch three times just to appreciate the intricacies. But the error described above is a weird one and a big conflict because the movie wouldn't work without it and yet...it is huge and annoying at the same time. Here this woman is basically a pauper yet a highly competent PI
Photo of Vincent Fournols

Vincent Fournols

  • 2901 Posts
  • 4837 Reply Likes
Thanks for the feedback. Maybe it is also explained more clearly in the novel, which I have not read either. It faintly rings a bell to me, maybe something I read in an article at the time.
Let us wait for more authoritative advices :)
Photo of Brad Twersky

Brad Twersky

  • 9 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
Yeah Jeorj...that's where I thought it should be when I originally submitted it and yet it still doesn't show in that section for The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo. See attached image
Photo of Michelle

Michelle, Official Rep

  • 11914 Posts
  • 7954 Reply Likes
Hi Brad -

This is confirmation that I have approved your Goof for "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo", note that I have modified it to include the Spoiler tag, it should be posted live on the site shortly.  Cheers!
(Edited)