#190617-235329-668000 -- this one was approved in system:
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/credit-is-awarded-incorrectly-by-production?topic-reply-list...
but actually the situation got worse than it was before.
And three more for images are pending much longer than advised by system:
#190616-203033-142702
#190616-203118-943002
#190616-203203-685102
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/credit-is-awarded-incorrectly-by-production?topic-reply-list...
but actually the situation got worse than it was before.
And three more for images are pending much longer than advised by system:
#190616-203033-142702
#190616-203118-943002
#190616-203203-685102
Posted 1 year ago
Michelle, Official Rep
Michelle, Official Rep
Hi MAthePA -
Apologies for the confusion, as I believe I fully understand the issue now. Amanda Gray performed the role in the episode, however, she was credited incorrectly in the on-screen credits (as Naiah Cummins - the initial individual cast in the role).
I have now removed the episode credit from Naiah Cummins' filmography, and have adjusted the credit on Amanda Gray's filmography to include the aka name attribute.
If there is anything further I'm missing, please do let me know!
Apologies for the confusion, as I believe I fully understand the issue now. Amanda Gray performed the role in the episode, however, she was credited incorrectly in the on-screen credits (as Naiah Cummins - the initial individual cast in the role).
I have now removed the episode credit from Naiah Cummins' filmography, and have adjusted the credit on Amanda Gray's filmography to include the aka name attribute.
If there is anything further I'm missing, please do let me know!
(Edited)
Yes, exactly as you sound now:
Michelle, thank you.
I see the credit alive now this way, except the ordering number, so one more little contribution (#190619-190225-169000):
Amanda Gray performed the role in the episode, however, she was credited incorrectly in the on-screen credits (as Naiah Cummins - the initial individual cast in the role).And the same was contributed, "approved" but not executed:
Michelle, thank you.
I see the credit alive now this way, except the ordering number, so one more little contribution (#190619-190225-169000):
MAthePA
Thank you for reply. However, my submission is not aimed to set "as Naiah Cummins" for Naiah Cummins. It was a mistake of production company to credit her instead of Amanda Gray (I). It's clearly explained in the contribution by the attached links:
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/credit-is-awarded-incorrectly-by-production
Amanda Gray explained this problem as well as her agreement to have such an alternate name.
It is ridiculous to see that two editors have not read those links at all.
Or the links do not work for editorial staff, I wonder? Please don't consider any emotion in my words -- it's simple wondering how such things may be automatically and perpetually ignored.
Thank you for help in this matter