Full title of the series: DC's Legends of Tomorrow

  • 1
  • Problem
  • Updated 1 year ago
  • Solved
  • (Edited)
I've discovered that TV series "Legends of Tomorrow" should actually be renamed "DC's Legends of Tomorrow". Not only the latter variant is actually what all the title cards says, it is also the what the official website says, as well as most of the promotional materials. It is pretty much the same case as with "Agatha Christie's Poirot"

I would have tried to correct this, but I think that needs some attention from the stuff, because if it was changed from "DC's Legends of Tomorrow" at some point, my corrections might be declined. Plus I am not sure that this listing was not corrected by CW. 
 
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 2986 Posts
  • 3896 Reply Likes

Posted 2 years ago

  • 1
Photo of Steve Crook

Steve Crook, Champion

  • 1382 Posts
  • 1744 Reply Likes
Hello Nikolay,
The title already has "DC's Legends of Tomorrow" as an AKA with the attribute "(alternative title)"

Which territory/ies will it be displayed in like that?

    Steve
Photo of Peter

Peter, Champion

  • 6644 Posts
  • 8097 Reply Likes
There is a rule about possessives, which should mean that Poirot should be listed without Agatha Christie:

"One exception to the "as it appears on screen" rule: Author or filmmaker possessives such as Bram Stoker's Dracula, Disney's The Kid, or Andy Warhol's Flesh are used only in alternate titles with the attribute (complete title) unless it is a part of the joke i.e. Jane Austen's Mafia! or Monty Python's Flying Circus. Note that by the time The Meaning of Life and Life of Brian were released the group had adopted the name "Monty Python" qualifying both as possessives."
https://help.imdb.com/article/contrib...

I'm not sure if this should apply to "DC".
Photo of Steve Crook

Steve Crook, Champion

  • 1382 Posts
  • 1744 Reply Likes
Thanks Peter, but isn't "DC's" still a filmmaker possessive?

Poirot appears for me (in the UK) as "Agatha Christie's Poirot"
It has the AKA "UK (complete title) ... Agatha Christie's Poirot"

    Steve
Photo of Peter

Peter, Champion

  • 6644 Posts
  • 8097 Reply Likes
The primary title is also Agatha Christie's Poirot, which seems like a mistake.

I guess "DC's" is used in the same spirit as the other possessives, so it makes sense not to include it in the primary title.
Photo of Michelle

Michelle, Official Rep

  • 12888 Posts
  • 9966 Reply Likes
Hi All -

I have reached out to our title editors to help clarify our rules regarding author or filmmaker possessives, as well as to take a look at the two titles referenced in this thread to confirm how the primary title should be listed.  As soon as I get confirmation I will let you know here.
Photo of Jaime

Jaime, Employee

  • 302 Posts
  • 316 Reply Likes
Hello all,

Thank you for your posts regarding the possessives on these two titles.

I can confirm Peter that Agatha Cristie's Poirot's primary text was incorrectly listed and breached IMDb policy, this has now been corrected.

As per the policy stated we do not list the possessive in the primary title so Legends of Tomorrow will remain listed in the same way as Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2364582/releaseinfo?ref_=tt_ql_dt_2_)

Regards
Jaime