How to join a 2-part episode into 1

  • 2
  • Question
  • Updated 3 months ago
  • Answered
What's the proper procedure to join 2 episodes together into one (and result in every episode after them in that season being renumbered) if the two episodes have the same title but with "part 1" and "part 2" appended to it?

I've tried various methods, including all in one step or in two steps, but they are all rejected (in the first step), and the instructions aren't very clear in the case where both titles are the same. The first broadcast dates are the same, no problem there.

When the episode pages were first created the contributor listed the episodes per syndication not original run. A double-length episode was the original; in syndication they were split into 2 parts. IMDb policy requires episodes be per original run not syndication, so I'm trying to correct this; just need to know I'm doing it right so it won't get rejected.
Photo of GoodFlixGary

GoodFlixGary

  • 175 Posts
  • 152 Reply Likes

Posted 4 months ago

  • 2
Photo of GMJ

GMJ, Champion

  • 3682 Posts
  • 6432 Reply Likes
1. Submit a title merge. Depending on how the episode titles are listed, go to the episode listed as Part 2.

When you get to the title form, revise the information this way:

Series Title: Leave this section as is.
Episode Title: Type the title listed in Part 1 (episode title - Part 1)
Number: Change the number to whatever number is assigned to Part 1.

In the Explanation box, include any URL links why the title is being merged.

2. After the titles have been merged and processed, submit a correction by removing Part 1 from the Episode Title (if necessary).

A few other things to consider after the page has been merged and updated:
  • Depending on when the 2-hour episode aired in the season, you may need to submit revisions to each episode's number.
  • Make sure the merged page has the correct running time from 60 minutes to 120 minutes or whatever the times are without commercials.

I hope this helps. Good luck.
Photo of GoodFlixGary

GoodFlixGary

  • 175 Posts
  • 152 Reply Likes
I believe I just said all that (though in not so many words). Thank you for posting the entire rules, but I don't think anyone's reading it. This thread was closed as answered: you can read the procedure for merging near the top of this thread.

The subject of this thread is moot, since IMDb already lists the episodes I've mentioned correctly as one episode. Nothing left to merge, all done.

The issue now is a different one: it's about on-screen titles. As stated in the rules you quoted, the title must be as it appeared on screen in its original run. Since the original run of all the ones I've mentioned do not have "part 1" in the title on-screen in the first broadcast, that material is incorrect and should be removed. There is no part 2 either.

It's very slow. Got another one corrected. Just 2 left now. One Rockford Files, one Bob's Burgers. Some idiot changed the one Rockford Files to "part 1 & 2" which is still wrong obviously. That wasn't you, was it? Don't know how that got approved. It's not part of the title on screen in the original broadcast.

There is another issue: the running time. The running time for the episodes I've mentioned are all wrong. I've posted the correct time, but it keeps getting declined.
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23068 Posts
  • 27331 Reply Likes
This is the 3rd time this week where someone thinks they know better and no one catches the glaring mistake being made.
Continue on with your messing up the database.
Good luck
Why does no one care?
Photo of GoodFlixGary

GoodFlixGary

  • 175 Posts
  • 152 Reply Likes
I'm not "messing up the database". Someone else put "part 1 & 2" on that one title (two titles actually, one of them was done that way last year). There's no way to tell who. What "glaring mistake" have you spotted? Are you referring to the addition of "part 1 & 2" in the title or something else? Try and get it removed, good luck.

And I care. Maybe you do to. But there's not many of us. And we're close to powerless; we're at the mercy of a bunch of editors who don't care and just push buttons (usually to decline with an "unable to verify" meaninglessness). As such a situation continues, people who care get discouraged and stop contributing. It's frustrating and one just gives up trying to correct mistakes. ADDING information to the database is a lot easier and is usually accepted fairly quickly. But if you're just one to correct wrong data, you've got an uphill and time-consuming battle.
Photo of meka

meka

  • 159 Posts
  • 201 Reply Likes
@Good Flix Gary it's probably him sabotaging your corrections. Rules does not mean anything to him, he can't comprehend rules, he only believes his misinterpretations, facts and proofs does not mean anything to him, he acts on his precious "memory", he doesn't understand any of your well written explanations and still continues to twist things you said. He thinks you're "messing up the database" by making these good contributions, rightful merges and corrections because he thinks his memory is the ultimate source in the world. He doesn't understand your explanations about syndicated runs as well and twists things you said.
(Edited)
Photo of GoodFlixGary

GoodFlixGary

  • 175 Posts
  • 152 Reply Likes
@meka Did you see Ed's post yesterday in this thread where he responded to you in a rather deranged manner? It had lots of words in all-caps and he was ranting about issuing subpoenas and legal procedings against you and I in an international court, and paranoid ravings that you and I were harassing him, and there were slurs against both of us, slamming our character and knowledge and proficiency in English, and he continued screaming (whole sentence in all-caps) about the "database" being "messed up" by you and I, like we're a criminal duo bent on world domination and destruction. He closed with a Borg-like order to "COMPLY". Resistance is futile!

It was pretty funny, but he apparently deleted it. Too bad; would have been nice to leave it for everyone to see how mentally unstable he obviously is.

I have encountered him before in another thread of mine, and he made no sense there either, and you're right he can't comprehend the rules. I just told him he was repeatedly making no sense and wasn't helping and he should just go away, and he did.

Anyway, his sabotage has been reversed. The "part 1 & 2" in the title has been removed now, after my last correction. One more to go (on Bob's Burgers, to remove "part 1 & 2" from a single title), but someone else did that last year, I doubt it was Ed.
(Edited)
Photo of GoodFlixGary

GoodFlixGary

  • 175 Posts
  • 152 Reply Likes
Anything happening with these merges? No response here for a week now since I posted the details asked for.
Photo of GoodFlixGary

GoodFlixGary

  • 175 Posts
  • 152 Reply Likes
This thread is closed as dead, no further response. I started a new thread at How to join a 2-part episode into 1 (take 2) about some of the problems I'm encountering following GMJ's instructions in this thread here.

Specifically, his Step 1 (the merge) worked fine, but Step 2 (removing "part 1" from title) wasn't working on some, and both followup Steps (correct running times & renumber subsequent episodes) weren't working either. See the new thread for details.