IMDb should buy Rotten Tomatoes. That would be a great synergy system. And really profitable. More than staying rivals

  • 1
  • Idea
  • Updated 6 years ago
  • Not Planned
Archived and Closed

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies and is no longer visible to community members. The community moderator provided the following reason for archiving: No longer relevant

It's a matter of benefits. Regarding everybody. We would benefit from the advantage of having all the latest movie knowledge and industry contacts, linked to the best globalized review database. In a really easy way. All in the same place. Or well, maybe it's more profitable if they keep on being 2 different websites, remaining the same business behind. And they, well, you know, they'll just get more and more money.

But, of course, they won't. Competence is necessary I suppose. If I were IMDb CEO, and had money, I'll seriously think bout it.

James
Photo of Jaime Fernández

Jaime Fernández

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes

Posted 6 years ago

  • 1
Photo of Dan Dassow

Dan Dassow, Champion

  • 13491 Posts
  • 13847 Reply Likes
IMDb already licenses information from MetaCritic [http://www.metacritic.com/] and displays it at the top of each film page when available. For example, this is the information displayed for Iron Man 3 (2013)
Metascore: 62/100
Reviews: 631 user | 349 critic | 43 from Metacritic.com
Metacritic provides similar information to Rotten Tomatoes.

If you could provide a sufficiently detailed business case with information on payback period, internal rates of return and risk. Amazon.com may consider your suggestion.
Photo of Emperor

Emperor, Champion

  • 6418 Posts
  • 3004 Reply Likes
It looks like Metacritic and IMDB have a deal where they supply the average reception and we give them movie information. I suspect, as it'd be mutually beneficial it'd be a tricky one to break, especially if the alternative involves significant outlay of cash as they'd presumably need to buy Flixter too (not that Amazon are shot of a bob or two but still this seems a much more low cost arrangement - however, if Amazon wanted to take out some of the competition in streaming video...).

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.