Archived and Closed
This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies and is no longer visible to community members. The community moderator provided the following reason for archiving: Old thread
I noticed the b movie '1313: Haunted Frat' was given a weighted rating of 6.9 out of 10 using your mysterious, bizarre weighted system of taking users' votes and perverting them into some new number. Arithmetic mean for this film is 5.5, as your site states. Yet most people familiar with David DeCoteau's pieces of crap he constantly churns out would likely give this one 1 or 2 at most out of 10.
I know for a fact there are award-winning films in your database that deserve higher user ratings based on actual votes, but are continually given suppressed weighted votes by your system that make them look unpopular or unliked when the opposite is true. But your weighted system giving this DeCoteau crap a 6.9 rating when it really deserves 5.5 at most simply exposes Imdb's bullshit system.
Ignore imdb user ratings on this site. Imdb employs a bullshit system that distorts viewers' opinions in favour of some other mysterious position that makes some bad films look better than they deserve, while other great films are left with low ratings.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1698658/
I know for a fact there are award-winning films in your database that deserve higher user ratings based on actual votes, but are continually given suppressed weighted votes by your system that make them look unpopular or unliked when the opposite is true. But your weighted system giving this DeCoteau crap a 6.9 rating when it really deserves 5.5 at most simply exposes Imdb's bullshit system.
Ignore imdb user ratings on this site. Imdb employs a bullshit system that distorts viewers' opinions in favour of some other mysterious position that makes some bad films look better than they deserve, while other great films are left with low ratings.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1698658/
Posted 7 years ago
