I was watching "Call Me By Your Name" tonight and the story (of which I have also read the book) is about a gay love affair between a 17 year old boy and a 22ish male border. Someone added the keyword "pedophilia".
Nothing in this story is even close to pedophilia. Pedophilia is an attraction to pre-pubescent children. A 17 year old boy is not pre-pubescent. I'm fairly certain this keyword was added to slander a movie about a gay love affair.
IMDb should really be careful about accepting loaded keywords. While pedophilia is a perfectly fine keyword and there are many movies that involve pedophilia, IMDb should verify the content before adding this keyword. Otherwise, it can be used to slander movies that may be against someones "religious beliefs".
Nothing in this story is even close to pedophilia. Pedophilia is an attraction to pre-pubescent children. A 17 year old boy is not pre-pubescent. I'm fairly certain this keyword was added to slander a movie about a gay love affair.
IMDb should really be careful about accepting loaded keywords. While pedophilia is a perfectly fine keyword and there are many movies that involve pedophilia, IMDb should verify the content before adding this keyword. Otherwise, it can be used to slander movies that may be against someones "religious beliefs".






Adrian, Champion
I doubt IMDb knows automatically whether keywords are loaded. I'm just suggesting they flag some such keywords to require human validation.
Jeorj Euler
The law factors into this in such a way as to render any "he said / she said" disputes across the line of the age of consent irrelevant, and a minor will not have to worry about an adult lying about the nature of a proved instance of sexual contact, as in whether the contact is coercive, extortive, exploitative or indeed neither violent nor tortful.
To get back on track, we can consider people who adopt the broader interpretation as incorrect. It is understandable to view the interpretation that way, given the meaning of the word "child", and the fact that there are indeed other words available to describe sexual contact between adults and non-prepubescent minors/youth: hebephilia and ephebophilia. Those words can be used instead.
On something of a side note, Adrian, you can please spare us references to "religious beliefs" and the cultures of the United States. We don't know that it has anything to do with it. The atheistic Soviet Union had the same views. Similar has been the case with the People's Republic of China, as well as North Korea, Cuba and post-glasnost post-perestroika Russia (along with non-Russian former Soviet bloc nations). I'm not buying this conjecture of a general intent of some contributors to defame movies about homosexual relationships. If somebody was out to use the keywords system to defame such movies, they would apply the keyword "pedophilia" to movies in which there are child characters and homosexual adult characters whereby there is no sexual contact between any child character and any adult character; an actual lie, in other words.
There can be merit in flagging some keywords to require human validation, but it is not something that could be effectively applied to all movies, series, specials, videos and games registered into the database. Specifically protecting Call Me By Your Name would be fine.