NC-17 movies

  • 2
  • Problem
  • Updated 4 years ago
  • Solved
Who is actually in charge of pages on imdb? I went to a page in search of a list of NC-17 movies and the first page 46 of the 50 aren't even NC-17, 41 on the second page,. How can someone be able to create a page with falsr titles?
Photo of thotuknew

thotuknew

  • 15 Posts
  • 6 Reply Likes

Posted 5 years ago

  • 2
Photo of gromit82

gromit82, Champion

  • 7543 Posts
  • 9624 Reply Likes
Terry: Please post the link to the list you are referring to. If this is a list created by an IMDb user, as opposed to one generated from the database or created by IMDb staff, then the answer to your question is that the only person responsible for a user-created list is the user themself.

If you disagree with the content of a list, you can either leave a comment on the list (if the list creator enabled that function) or send a private message to the list creator. But the IMDb staff does not get involved in judging the accuracy of user-created lists.

However, if this is a list generated from the database or created by IMDb staff, please provide the link here and perhaps the problems with the list can be resolved.
Photo of thotuknew

thotuknew

  • 15 Posts
  • 6 Reply Likes
http://www.imdb.com/search/title?certificates=us:nc_17. I don't see anything that says one way or the other, but maybe I missed it. There is a leave a feedback link, but that's how I ended up here.
(Edited)
Photo of bluesmanSF

bluesmanSF, Champion

  • 10815 Posts
  • 6434 Reply Likes
That's not a user list, but a list created by a search of the site. I notice, looking at American Psycho, which displays an "R" rating, that it also has:

USA:NC-17 (original cut)
listed. This is what, mostly likely, is causing it to appear on a list of NC-17 rated films. Note from your link that it searches the "certificates" section, which is where this NC-17 rating is displayed.

An example of a user-created list would be http://www.imdb.com/list/ls000809224/
(Edited)
Photo of gromit82

gromit82, Champion

  • 7543 Posts
  • 9624 Reply Likes
Terry: Thanks for the link.

http://www.imdb.com/search/title?certificates=us:nc_17 is a list generated from the database, so it is supposed to be correct, although I agree with you that it isn't currently correct.

The reason that films such as The Godfather: Part III (which was rated R, not NC-17) are showing up on this list of NC-17 rated films is that there is an entry in the database that the film had NC-17 as its original rating. (See http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099674/parentalguide.) Even though the film apparently had to be edited to secure an R rating from the MPAA instead of NC-17, the film never was released with an NC-17 rating, and the MPAA's official database at http://www.filmratings.com/ lists the film as being just rated R, with no notes to indicate that it was ever rated anything else.

I would like the IMDb staff to comment on this and advise whether these "original ratings" under which the films were never released should be listed in the Certificates section (and thus clutter up lists like the one you are asking about), or whether it would be better just to mention them as Trivia, if at all.
Photo of bluesmanSF

bluesmanSF, Champion

  • 10815 Posts
  • 6434 Reply Likes
I love that, "mention them as Trivia" idea. Keeping them out of the section might be the only way, for now, to keep them out of the search, so it'd create a way to keep the mention of them, but not affect searches.
Photo of Michelle

Michelle, Official Rep

  • 13256 Posts
  • 10619 Reply Likes
Hi gromit82 and bluesmanSF - thanks for asking about these listings and sharing your feedback.  I have forwarded your comments to our data editors, as soon as  I hear back I will post their take on this here.
Photo of Michelle

Michelle, Official Rep

  • 13256 Posts
  • 10619 Reply Likes
Just following up here to confirm that our data editors agreed that the "non-released" certificates should be removed,  our staff are planning to sort it out shortly.
Photo of Col Needham

Col Needham, Official Rep

  • 6866 Posts
  • 4909 Reply Likes
This should be fixed now, thanks.  Please let us know if not.