Archived and Closed
This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies and is no longer visible to community members.
- 20 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
Posted 7 years ago
bluesmanSF, Champion
- 10815 Posts
- 6434 Reply Likes
Again, take your little catfight elsewhere. This is not the place for it.
- 20 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
bluesmanSF, Champion
- 10815 Posts
- 6434 Reply Likes
Good luck. But flooding this board to start fights ain't going to help you. If you don't like how you're appearing all over the Internet, act more professionally.
- 20 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
bluesmanSF, Champion
- 10815 Posts
- 6434 Reply Likes
You're doing more, by continuing this ridiculousness, to tarnish your fine name and reputation than a lunatic rambling on on the internet could ever have done. You don't seem to be getting the point. You're now making the same type of threats against IMDb. More people have heard of IMDb than of you or the other idiot you've been arguing with. I'd say, since you're getting the benefit of being listed on IMDb, you don't bite the hand that feeds you. Bashing or trying to damage IMDb does you no good. You brought the fight to a public board. So, saying IMDb has exposed you to this is ridiculous. Flooding this board with, yet a third thread about this is juvenile and idiotic. So, how's your search engine situation shipping up, so far? Now it's just you arguing against reason and sanity...and you're losing.
By the way, most IMDb data is contributed by users with anonymous user names. We can't really be slandered on the internet, in any way. You situation is kind of uniques and posting warnings that someone will call us a bad name is pretty worthless to us.
- 20 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
bluesmanSF, Champion
- 10815 Posts
- 6434 Reply Likes
If you leave it, users will not "decide." They'll ignore and move along (which they're likely doing anyway). This is only an issue to you.
- 20 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
bluesmanSF, Champion
- 10815 Posts
- 6434 Reply Likes
- 20 Posts
- 3 Reply Likes
- 5 Posts
- 1 Reply Like
No, it does not. So-called "employees" Withouabox [sic] FAQ and IMDb FAQ made some announcements months ago, but posted no replies to this Board. Col Needham, Kathy, Lina, Matt, and Tom have collectively posted nothing. Jake, imdbhb, hbgs, Kris, and Marissa each made one reply; Meenah has posted two replies; Michael and Karin have each posted three replies; Jordan has posted eight replies, Chelsea has posted 13 replies, Nancy has posted 14 replies; leaving Giancarlo, Michelle, Alex, and Ann as the only four employees "overseeing/moderating" this Board.
# "How does this make you feel?"
Marginalised.
bluesmanSF, Champion
- 10815 Posts
- 6434 Reply Likes
Not gettin' ya. Got anything that makes any sense?
- 5 Posts
- 1 Reply Like
bluesmanSF, Champion
- 10815 Posts
- 6434 Reply Likes
But thanks for trying.
- 5 Posts
- 1 Reply Like
The word "probably" means you don't know. There is no reason to think "all threads get read by staff", and the change-log is immaterial to your claim of "22 Employees". Accusing me of "trolling" only means you're out of ideas.
bluesmanSF, Champion
- 10815 Posts
- 6434 Reply Likes
Why don't you start an idea thread that suggests they change the page and all reference to 22 people? It soooo changes everything! Each time, though, one clocks in/out they would have to re-write the page but it make such a HUGE difference. It'd be WELL worth it!
Glad you signed up to make this SOOOO important point!
Although...I did say "probably more" and not "probably"...no, no...we'll go with your 15 people who've posted as "overseeing and moderating" although, posting has nothing, whatsoever to do with neither...or even your four moderator's, though more than that has removed or archived posts...to prove that this board is not, in fact moderated...no wait, how does that prove anything? No, no matter. You're clearly right!
Well now, if you could only pick apart spelling, then you'd clearly just be trolling because that's what they end up resorting to when out of ideas...no, wait you did that too! Well, we should let that slide because you'vendone so much to clear up this 22 people thing.
So, my answer was wrong...the board is not moderated (because there is no proof some of those people listed exist)...so what's the answer to poor Jurgen on how to remove bad words? If there are only four people moderating and that's not enough to handle a dozen posts per day, how does he remove the innappropriate language?
Update: Col Needham has now participated in moderating the boards by deleting a thread...you can take him off your list of nonparticipants and slide him over to participant...but you're probably right...
- 5 Posts
- 1 Reply Like
This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.
This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.



