Policy update: Audio only podcasts can now be listed on IMDb!

  • 10
  • Announcement
  • Updated 2 months ago
  • (Edited)
Hey all!

We're happy to announce that as of today we'll begin accepting submissions of audio only podcasts (as you know, video ones are already eligible) to expand our data catalog. These are a hugely popular medium and something IMDb users have been asking to include for some time.

For the timebeing these can be submitted using the existing contribution interface - to do so:

  1. Head on over to the new title submission form

  2. Choose the type per the choices below:

    • If it's episodic then select the type "Made for TV" and sub-type "TV-Series"

    • If it's a one-off with no episodes then select the type "Made for Video

  3. Include the keyword "category-podcast" on the main parent series page (if there are episodes, you don't need to add the keyword to each one) 

  4. If the podcast is audio only then please also add the keyword "audio-only"

  5. A link to somewhere the podcast can be watched or listened to should be submitted in the Miscellaneous Link section, with the description "WebsiteName - Full audio", or "WebsiteName - Full video", as appropriate.
We're aware that the “TV series” and “Video” labels aren’t a great fit and that podcasts won't be clearly labeled as “Podcast” (other than the keyword which is buried in the Plot Keywords section).

However, accepting these types of title now enables us to learn a few important things before deciding whether or how to change our data structure in the future.

There's also an unknown number of video podcasts on IMDb already as the absence of a proper label has made it difficult to spot when a podcast has been approved. This change will let us start building up a catalog of podcasts now, while also tidying up our existing catalog!

You can find the title formatting for Podcasts on our help site here:


Let me know if you have any questions. 

Photo of Joel

Joel, Official Rep

  • 1238 Posts
  • 1733 Reply Likes

Posted 6 months ago

  • 10
Photo of Peter

Peter, Champion

  • 8246 Posts
  • 10756 Reply Likes
If I were to add a podcast from a long-running radio show, I assume the listing should start when the podcast started and not when the radio show started? And the contents should be based only on the podcast, not the radio broadcast?
Photo of Joel

Joel, Official Rep

  • 1238 Posts
  • 1733 Reply Likes
Great question as always. 

As the radio show came first and we try to list a series by it's original release - we'll accept the earliest date for the radio broadcast too and you can add these as "episodes" too. 
Photo of Dan Dassow

Dan Dassow, Champion

  • 16989 Posts
  • 19271 Reply Likes

I'm assuming that the same applies for long-running television shows and YouTube videos.
Photo of Phil G

Phil G

  • 213 Posts
  • 471 Reply Likes
What is IMDb's definition of podcast, please? It may seem obvious to you, but I bet if you ask around you'll get many differing interpretations of what should be included.  What, in IMDb's view, are the specific aspects that distinguish a podcast from the many other forms of audio productions?

Without a clear definition, you could be opening the floodgates here... but then again, maybe that's the intention: I could equally ask why allow only podcasts, why not also allow (some of) the many other forms of audio productions? An average radio play arguably has far more in common with IMDb's core interest in movies than many podcasts, should they be eligible for listing too?

It would probably be a good idea to develop a clear policy for radio productions at least, if not all audio-only productions. Noting your reply to Peter, I don't think "has a related podcast" is really a good criterion for eligibility. If a radio show with a podcast is eligible, then shouldn't a near-identical radio show without a podcast also be eligible? If not, why not?

For the record, I have no strong opinion on which, if any, forms of audio-only productions should be eligible. I do however, think it's important to get the policy absolutely clear right from the beginning to avoid problems and the need for clean-up work later.

podcasts won't be clearly labeled as “Podcast” (other than the keyword...
Some keywords already affect display, such as tv-mini-series, tv-special, etc. Couldn't that same approach be implemented here too?

Photo of Afshin


  • 13 Posts
  • 9 Reply Likes
Chicago cap from 1993 from five was a five
Photo of Joel

Joel, Official Rep

  • 1238 Posts
  • 1733 Reply Likes
Hey all,

Thanks for this feedback.

We appreciate the definition isn't super clear cut right now and it's something we're trying to iterate on to find the best fit.

There's ongoing discussions within the team about how to really define what we consider a 'Podcast' and our current thinking is that if the creators specifically made a piece of content to be streamed or downloaded outside of a live broadcast then these will be eligible.

There is also the position that a Podcast often features one or more recurring hosts or actors engaged in a discussion about some topic or narrative.

For example, a breakfast radio show broadcasting live on it's own is ineligible unless re-packaged and made available for streaming or downloading at a later time, this can then be added. 

Of course we're interested to hear your thoughts and will expand on the idea of other audio productions soon. 

In regards to the tv-special and tv-mini-series keywords having an affect on display, you're completely right and this avenue is something we're keeping in mind.

Looking forward to your feedback.

Photo of Afshin


  • 13 Posts
  • 9 Reply Likes
Best Long T.V Series for me OZ-1998-2003
HighlanderT.V Series for 1996-1999
New York Park West for 1995-1997
Photo of Max Flight

Max Flight

  • 3 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
The podcast community already has a definition of "podcast" and I'd suggest IMDB embrace that. A podcast is an on-demand audio or video program that has a public RSS feed. It's that simple.

What's not simple is the convoluted, confusing, incredibly outdated submission process. I hate to be negative, but it's a real mess and clearly designed for other media. I know other podcasters (professionals) who really struggled with it. I got maybe halfway through and became so agitated with the interface that I bailed out. I wasn't stumped and I wasn't unable to continue, but it was so bad that I couldn't bring myself to endure the pain of poor design. And certainly not for my two other podcasts after that! Please, pay for a re-write of that whole interface.
Photo of Devlin Wilder

Devlin Wilder

  • 2 Posts
  • 3 Reply Likes
You have it right on the money on both accounts. Col and the IMDb staff have made numerous changes and updates to the database over the years now including a fully-functioning original content streaming service BUT they REFUSE to update the antiquated submission process and actual information offering which is the original and utmost purpose of the database (being a DATABASE) to begin with. Audio offerings were never meant to be a part of the database and now that they are, they won't even give them a proper title designation so the users of the database can actually tell them apart from all the other titles and title types already listed which already make the site a cesspool of meandering information much of the time as it is. Web series never received a title designation either with thousands of them listed on the database as TV series or made-for-video when they are an entirely different part of the industry. It's honestly MADDENING.
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 3732 Posts
  • 5170 Reply Likes
Devlin Wilder, just wondering — what aspects of submission process you consider antiquated and why? 

As for web-series: it's been said quite a lot: why even try imposing the difference between web-series and TV series if difference is becoming more and more vague? A more logical step that might occur is transition to just series, dropping both web- and TV-. 
Photo of Max Flight

Max Flight

  • 3 Posts
  • 5 Reply Likes
I'll answer that from my standpoint. It starts with this...

Choose the type per the choices below:

  • If it's episodic then select the type "Made for TV" and sub-type "TV-Series"

  • If it's a one-off with no episodes then select the type "Made for Video
Say what??? I'm supposed to call my podcasts "Made for TV"??? Then add another TV sub-type? Sorry, I don't play with people who insult my intelligence. Do it properly or don't do it at all.

Beyond that, the user interface looks like it was written in what, 2005? And IMDB wants generally tech-savvy podcasters to embrace this? I don't think it's going to work out so well. It didn't for me. I walked away. I know others who did the same. And one (just one) who put up with the nonsense and submitted his podcast. But he's a lawyer and you know lawyers, they love the challenge of weird and convoluted processes. The rest of us aren't so driven.

Photo of J.


  • 477 Posts
  • 681 Reply Likes
I love it!

This move was probably inevitable, given that many podcasts begin as audio-only, and then graduate to video.

Others are audio-only, but appear on YouTube as ersatz videos, with one static image used throughout.

By the way, many old-time radio shows from the 1930s-1960s have been resurrected as podcasts. Eventually you'll have to decide whether you want to start listing these as well. Note that many radio serials (The Lone Ranger, DragnetThe Guiding Light, etc.) appeared simultaneously with their television versions. By the time old radio shows appear in the database, you'll need to have a clear way of distinguishing them from TV productions.