Poll Suggestion: Highest Rated Movie of 2010s

  • 1
  • Idea
  • Updated 4 days ago
  • (Edited)
Which of the 2010's highest rated movie of each year according to all-time user ratings averages is your favorite?

https://www.imdb.com/list/ls049275142/
Photo of Paok-Kilkis

Paok-Kilkis

  • 3134 Posts
  • 2999 Reply Likes

Posted 4 months ago

  • 1
Photo of Eagles90

Eagles90

  • 180 Posts
  • 248 Reply Likes
Inception
Photo of Dan Dassow

Dan Dassow, Champion

  • 13954 Posts
  • 14575 Reply Likes
Paok,

Please change the title of your list from:
Highest Rated Movie of 2010's

To:
Highest Rated Movie of 2010s
Photo of Paok-Kilkis

Paok-Kilkis

  • 3134 Posts
  • 2999 Reply Likes
Corrected
Photo of Dan Dassow

Dan Dassow, Champion

  • 13954 Posts
  • 14575 Reply Likes
Paok,

Thanks. I updated the title of the thread accordingly.
Photo of Paok-Kilkis

Paok-Kilkis

  • 3134 Posts
  • 2999 Reply Likes
bump
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 2975 Posts
  • 3868 Reply Likes
Paok-Kilkis, this last comment was caught in the spam filter sihed it out. 

Also, you and Ed are confusing mathematical decades which indeed end in 00's and start in 1's with cultural decades, which are more naturally (less if you're a mathematician) divided into 80's, 90's, 00's etc.
(Edited)
Photo of Ed Jones (XLIX)

Ed Jones (XLIX)

  • 16364 Posts
  • 18752 Reply Likes
He is still hogging an idea for a poll that has no business being suggested prior to the end of the year by your reasoning. Either way, the 2010's are not over yet.
Photo of Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin)

Nikolay Yeriomin (Mykola Yeromin), Champion

  • 2975 Posts
  • 3868 Reply Likes
Ed Jones (XLIX) I'd say that as a term 2010's are definitely referring to 2010-2019. Mathematically decade still started on 2011 and will end on 2020... 
Photo of cinephile

cinephile

  • 968 Posts
  • 1517 Reply Likes
I agree with you Nikolay. Image result for I agree meme
Photo of cinephile

cinephile

  • 968 Posts
  • 1517 Reply Likes
BTW, I didn't make this meme myself, it comes from a website.
Source:https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/055/528/Einstein-I-agree-with-Nick.jpg  
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3439 Posts
  • 5752 Reply Likes
I suppose Endgame.
Photo of cinephile

cinephile

  • 968 Posts
  • 1517 Reply Likes
DISLIKE
Photo of Mohit Mago

Mohit Mago

  • 98 Posts
  • 144 Reply Likes
I've only watched one of these but it was really good Endgame
Photo of cinephile

cinephile

  • 968 Posts
  • 1517 Reply Likes
DISLIKE
Photo of Gitte Løyche

Gitte Løyche

  • 802 Posts
  • 1710 Reply Likes
Django Unchained
Photo of Paok-Kilkis

Paok-Kilkis

  • 3134 Posts
  • 2999 Reply Likes
bump
Photo of Peter

Peter, Champion

  • 6615 Posts
  • 8060 Reply Likes
Is this based on Top 250 ratings, or did you set a minimum number of votes?
Photo of Paok-Kilkis

Paok-Kilkis

  • 3134 Posts
  • 2999 Reply Likes
Drishyam added unfortunately. I hope by the time this goes live (if it goes live) The Wolf of Wall Street will surpass it.
Photo of Breumaster

Breumaster

  • 2718 Posts
  • 3931 Reply Likes
I guess it won't. Just if ~10.000 people rate 'Drishyam' (2013) lower than the others did. 'Wolf of Wallstreet' has it's result from more then 1.000.000 raters. It can only move slowly up, except there were 500.000 people rating 'Wolf of Wallstreet' higher.
I saw the 2015s 'Drishyam' and it was great !
Photo of Breumaster

Breumaster

  • 2718 Posts
  • 3931 Reply Likes
I guess it won't. Just if ~10.000 people rate 'Drishyam' (2013) lower than the others did. 'Wolf of Wallstreet' has it's result from more then 1.000.000 raters. It can only move slowly up, except there were 500.000 people rating 'Wolf of Wallstreet' higher.
I saw the 2015s 'Drishyam' and it was great !
Photo of Paok-Kilkis

Paok-Kilkis

  • 3134 Posts
  • 2999 Reply Likes
It may be good, I don't know since I haven't seen it, but I don't like the fact that a movie with only 25.000 votes is higher from a movie made by legendary Martin Scorsese with 1.000.000 votes.
Photo of Paok-Kilkis

Paok-Kilkis

  • 3134 Posts
  • 2999 Reply Likes
It may be good, I don't know since I haven't seen it, but I don't like the fact that a movie with only 25.000 votes is higher from a movie made by legendary Martin Scorsese with 1.000.000 votes.
Photo of Mohit Mago

Mohit Mago

  • 98 Posts
  • 144 Reply Likes
there are some instances of good movies having low ratings and okay movies having high ratings... just saying ratings are often helpful but you can't depend solely on them
Photo of NarniaisAwesome

NarniaisAwesome

  • 3393 Posts
  • 5691 Reply Likes
I agree.  :)  
Photo of cinephile

cinephile

  • 968 Posts
  • 1517 Reply Likes
In theory,  Inception is not a 2010s movie the 10s began in 2011. '' For example, the period from 1961 to 1970 was the 7th decade of the 20th century''

Source:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decade and My History Classes of Highschool.

Photo of Peter

Peter, Champion

  • 6615 Posts
  • 8060 Reply Likes
The text continues, "the most common way to count decades is to group years based on their shared tens digit like the nineteen-sixties (1960s) referring to the period from 1960 to 1969."
Photo of cinephile

cinephile

  • 968 Posts
  • 1517 Reply Likes
Historians have never included a year zero. This means that between, for example, 1 January 500 BC and 1 January AD 500, there are 999 years: 500 years BC, and 499 years AD preceding 500. In common usage anno Domini 1 is preceded by the year 1 BC, without an intervening year zero. If I did your common way in my class history of high school, I would have failed every exam,  THE CORRECT WAY IS for example 1961 to 1970 because year 0 never existed, I don't care the common way,  I care the correct way the first decade of our era is year 1,  because in history it is impossible to have year 0.

1-10
11-20
21-30
31-40
41-50
51-60
...





Photo of Breumaster

Breumaster

  • 2718 Posts
  • 3931 Reply Likes
No, the 13th century begann at January 1th, 00:00:00, 1200 AD. Last century was 20th century, even though it was 19xx, now we have the 21th century, even though there's no 21xx. It's still 2019 AD in the 21th century. Why should it be otherwise with the decades? When you have devices at the computer, for you there are the devices 1, 2, 3, ... The computer counts the devices 0, 1, 2 ... your device is 1 while the same device for computer is 0. 2 you, 1 computer, etc. ...
You see, even other intelligent people may count otherwise in some way.
Photo of cinephile

cinephile

  • 968 Posts
  • 1517 Reply Likes
I will make a break it is impossible to explain you that you are wrong.
Photo of Hoekkie

Hoekkie

  • 876 Posts
  • 468 Reply Likes
I think both is possible, so you are both right. But I found this with the link you send cinephile:

The most common way to refer to decades is to group years based on their shared tens digit, such as the nineteen-sixties (1960s) referring to the period from 1960 to 1969.

I prefer this as well.
Photo of Paok-Kilkis

Paok-Kilkis

  • 3134 Posts
  • 2999 Reply Likes
Avengers: Endgame is replaced by Joker