Receipt #181119-182028-719000.

  • 1
  • Question
  • Updated 12 months ago
  • Answered
Hello IMDb!

As mentioned, I'm not in Lifetime's "The Bling Ring" title. I am not in it in any capacity. Their producer, Philip Harrelson, is confirming this to you all with an update. He is a producer of the title. I appreciate commitment to accuracy, and this update has been mishandled. Many people have their IMDb handled by management, at certain times, and mistakes happen. Let's kindly resolve this for good.

Please look out for Philip Harrelson's update. Mine is #181119-182028-719000. I'm looking forward to clearing this up so your site is more accurate, as you say is IMDb's main objective. Thank you!!!

GL
Photo of George Loomis

George Loomis

  • 126 Posts
  • 65 Reply Likes

Posted 12 months ago

  • 1
Photo of ljdoncel

ljdoncel, Champion

  • 843 Posts
  • 1788 Reply Likes
Hi, George:

I'm going to be sincere. This is what sounds strange to me (and perhaps to as well and that may be the reason why they're reluctant to accept your corrections). There are titles listed in your page for over 8 years and we've never heard any complaints about them...


...but now that those entries are marked as (uncredited), presumably because your name doesn't appear in the on-screen credits, suddenly you claim that you have absolutely nothing to do with those titles; not only that you weren't billed on screen, but that you weren't in them in any capacity...

No offence, but the conclusion is that either you've been falsely enriching your resumé for a long time, or that you're intentionally trying to clean it up of valid (uncredited) entries (on the false belief that they're just extra roles).

What would happen if some staffer/contributor watched The Bling Ring (as you challenged) and spotted you there? You risk losing your reliability for future updates...
Photo of George Loomis

George Loomis

  • 126 Posts
  • 65 Reply Likes
Unfortunately, that's not true. I have disputed The Bling Ring credit for years!!! Oh how I wish you were right. I have disputed it for years. I stopped for several years, but I first clarified that I was not in that Lifetime film years ago. That's not up for debate; I just remember thinking, "Wow...this isn't worth my time" but now it is.

The other answer to your question "Why now?" is I have a feature film doing festivals right now, and I have sales agents urging me to make sure that my page is most accurate. That's why I have been doing much-needed maintenance and my updates have gone up in the past year.
Re: your other question, if someone were to watch The Bling Ring looking for me, I would love that! I'm not in it.

I am 10,000% not in Most Wanted (2011). I was booked for it through a friend, Kozmo Koz, and then I had to cancel because of a double-booking. That's a fact. My friend Kozmo Koz presented the opportunity, and I have absolutely nothing to do with that film. I never set foot on the Most Wanted set. The credit has looked inaccurate to me for a long time. It doesn't look inaccurate as much as it's totally false. I never danced in that film. We cancelled the booking because I'm not a dancer, and I did something else.

Thanks for the sincerity!
Photo of George Loomis

George Loomis

  • 126 Posts
  • 65 Reply Likes
The Most Wanted credit was never disputed because even though I never shot the film, I assumed that maybe Kozmo had put me in the credits by mistake. I see in your screenshot that it showed credit (as George Loomis III). That made me think that a mistake had been made since I had originally planned to be part of it.

I had never watched the film to see for myself because I ultimately didn't work on it. Fact!

Gotta run for now.. and thanks again
Photo of ljdoncel

ljdoncel, Champion

  • 843 Posts
  • 1788 Reply Likes
Thanks for the clarification, George.

I'm really intrigued now, so I'll try to watch The Bling Ring this weekend...
Photo of George Loomis

George Loomis

  • 126 Posts
  • 65 Reply Likes
Thank you sir. I understand the train of thinking you mentioned (I'm against skepticism to find the truth, but I get it).

I just merged my page with a duplicate, holding a credit I genuinely don't want for a feature film that didn't really go anywhere, and that's a great gauge of authenticity here. (Contribution #181127-232049-041000). I really didn't want to merge. I'm under a lot of pressure to keep my page and name accurate now, and that's the main reason for the urgency. Having my feature in sales has these effects.

I just heard back from Dallas King (director of Most Wanted, which I'm most definitely not in. I swear to God and all Gods, and on my grave!).

Dallas King knows I'm not in Most Wanted. He made the film. It looks cool, but I don't even know what it's about. I'm hoping someone will please process his more than honest request. I don't have the number, but IMDb please expect it. Thank you again.
Photo of Michelle

Michelle, Official Rep

  • 12888 Posts
  • 9973 Reply Likes
Hi George -

Our aim is to be the most complete and reliable source of movie, TV, and entertainment information on the web. In order to continue offering our users an accurate and trustworthy service, it is our policy not to alter or delete any kind of correct/factual information from our records.

We believe the credits listed are factual, as such we cannot remove them.
Photo of George Loomis

George Loomis

  • 126 Posts
  • 65 Reply Likes
Haha Michelle OK... I can't help but laugh as I have absolutely no idea what Most Wanted is even about. I'm going to prioritize the user who wrongfully altered the Story Pig credits first... Thank you.
Photo of ljdoncel

ljdoncel, Champion

  • 843 Posts
  • 1788 Reply Likes
George, just a brief recap (including the other thread)...
I have nothing to do with this title [...]
This is the second time you all are fighting me on something in a week.
It’s unprofessional. [...] Now you’re insisting that I’m in a film that I’m not in.
Do you want to watch the film and get back to me? These responses are unacceptable. I’m not going to back down or understand why you’re flaunting passion for accuracy
[...] I will keep submitting proof that I’m not in this movie
[...] I was not in that Lifetime film years ago. That's not up for debate
if someone were to watch The Bling Ring looking for me, I would love that! I'm not in it.
I've been able to watch The Bling Ring... actually, only the first 14 minutes... Now that I know the truth, what do you think I should say?

Sometimes skepticism is not a bad thing...
(Edited)
Photo of George Loomis

George Loomis

  • 126 Posts
  • 65 Reply Likes
OK. I think I am wrong about Lifetime's The Bling Ring. I didn't film it under this title. I am more than comfortable and man enough to admit when I'm wrong.

I just found a bootleg copy online and watched at 14:00. @ljdoncel my man, you could have just said, "I think I saw you here, yeah?" I did not think I was in this title. You seem to react as if I knew you'd find me there all along? I didn't. I have never seen that footage.

Also, the pulling quotes thing makes me sad you wasted time doing that. I stand by what I said in many cases, as Most Wanted is a title I did not ultimately perform in -- it was added when a friend had attached me to it. Responding and closing threads is unprofessional when something isn't resolved.

Thanks for watching and resolving!

GL
Photo of David Roldan

David Roldan

  • 5 Posts
  • 6 Reply Likes
Escribe una respuesta