My contribution (#181025-225142-436004) has been declined.
My question is: is this because of any use of profanity or strong words (which I could change so it gets approved), or is it because of the wording in general, which I admit it's aggressive (although I judge it to be an appropriate response to the way the subject is dealt with on the film - after all, it is a propaganda film)?
I hope it's not because the editors disagree with my personal political and philosophical views, as exposed on my review.
If we can't get political when reviewing a movie made precisely to push a particular political point-of-view, then I suppose the whole idea of reviewing movies loses its merit.
Thank you in advance for providing me an explanation.
My question is: is this because of any use of profanity or strong words (which I could change so it gets approved), or is it because of the wording in general, which I admit it's aggressive (although I judge it to be an appropriate response to the way the subject is dealt with on the film - after all, it is a propaganda film)?
I hope it's not because the editors disagree with my personal political and philosophical views, as exposed on my review.
If we can't get political when reviewing a movie made precisely to push a particular political point-of-view, then I suppose the whole idea of reviewing movies loses its merit.
Thank you in advance for providing me an explanation.
Posted 2 years ago
There are no replies.
