Hello,
I found some titles that have a still image or a product art as a primary poster. The problem is when those images have been submitted by a "studio partner" no one can't suggest an actual poster.
Examples: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9381998
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3719948
My question is, can't IMDb do something about it? Because they are not posters at all.
Moreover does "studio partner" means someone with scorecard access?
If yes, then if a theatrical distributor submit a poster and set it as primary image but later the dvd/blu-ray distributor upload the product art and set it as primary, that creates a conflict.
Can't you tell these people to at least make sure they use a real poster as primary image when available instead of something that make the title's page not good looking, it's in their best interest too eventually.
Just my opinion,
Cheers.
I found some titles that have a still image or a product art as a primary poster. The problem is when those images have been submitted by a "studio partner" no one can't suggest an actual poster.
Examples: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9381998
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3719948
My question is, can't IMDb do something about it? Because they are not posters at all.
Moreover does "studio partner" means someone with scorecard access?
If yes, then if a theatrical distributor submit a poster and set it as primary image but later the dvd/blu-ray distributor upload the product art and set it as primary, that creates a conflict.
Can't you tell these people to at least make sure they use a real poster as primary image when available instead of something that make the title's page not good looking, it's in their best interest too eventually.
Just my opinion,
Cheers.
Posted 1 year ago
Charlie, Employee
