I anticipate that this will get "kickback" (ready, Ed Jones and other anti-metooers?), but sexist keywords should be unacceptable, especially since they are often synonyms for other acceptable and more prolific keywords.
Please eliminate: "boobs," "jugs," "tits" as keywords.
Please eliminate such extremely subjective keywords as "creamy-legs," "desirable-legs," "exquisite-legs," "hot-legs," "pretty-legs," sexy-legs," "slender-legs," "slim-legs," "thin-legs," etc. Even "legs-to die-for." (And NONE of these appear in any title with Betty Grable, who probably had the most famous legs in film history!)
Please eliminate such keywords as "babe" (with the understandable exception of "babe-scientist"), "chick" (unless it refers to a small, young bird-the-animal), "hottie," etc.
Most of these are references to people of the female gender. There are, of course, some that refer to people of the male gender that should be equally unacceptable, i.e. "dick," "prick," etc. instead of "penis."
Resisters may long for "the good old days," but, especially in this "Harvey Weinstein" time, we need to be more cognizant of reality. Until someone invents a real time machine, there is probably no other way to go back to the past. We must live in the now and anticipate the future.
P.S. Do "creamy-legs" and "creamy-thighs" refer to skin tone or ejaculate?
Please eliminate: "boobs," "jugs," "tits" as keywords.
Please eliminate such extremely subjective keywords as "creamy-legs," "desirable-legs," "exquisite-legs," "hot-legs," "pretty-legs," sexy-legs," "slender-legs," "slim-legs," "thin-legs," etc. Even "legs-to die-for." (And NONE of these appear in any title with Betty Grable, who probably had the most famous legs in film history!)
Please eliminate such keywords as "babe" (with the understandable exception of "babe-scientist"), "chick" (unless it refers to a small, young bird-the-animal), "hottie," etc.
Most of these are references to people of the female gender. There are, of course, some that refer to people of the male gender that should be equally unacceptable, i.e. "dick," "prick," etc. instead of "penis."
Resisters may long for "the good old days," but, especially in this "Harvey Weinstein" time, we need to be more cognizant of reality. Until someone invents a real time machine, there is probably no other way to go back to the past. We must live in the now and anticipate the future.
P.S. Do "creamy-legs" and "creamy-thighs" refer to skin tone or ejaculate?
Posted 4 months ago
"creamy-legs" "creamy-legs" "creamy-legs"
What is it with "creamy-legs" and IMDb? (A love affair?)
Now, "creamy-legs" is appearing as THE ONLY keyword on titles. Here are two examples:
Mean Gurls (????)
Ching yuk jin cheung (1993)
Are they submissions from the same contributor? Again I ask, what is going on?
What is it with "creamy-legs" and IMDb? (A love affair?)
Now, "creamy-legs" is appearing as THE ONLY keyword on titles. Here are two examples:
Mean Gurls (????)
Ching yuk jin cheung (1993)
Are they submissions from the same contributor? Again I ask, what is going on?
(Edited)
Some of your acquaintances might want to cal that "succulent legs." Napkins available?
Lol!
He and I are friends, he has a great wine collection, especially Tuscan Reds.
Lol again!
And another absolutely unbelievable keyword: "showing-skin"! What?
If this is a valid keyword, it should probably be added to any title about Ed Gein or nazi lampshades -- to any title with a human being or animal. Ridiculous.
Grayson, Employee
