Submission of public domain images -- all published material before 1923 is free of copyright.

  • 18
  • Idea
  • Updated 5 years ago
  • Implemented
Archived and Closed

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies and is no longer visible to community members. The community moderator provided the following reason for archiving: No longer relevant

I understand IMDb policy regarding submission of posters and images -- that you must be associated with the title and be the copyright holder. However, is there any thought to revising that policy regarding material that is too old to be covered by copyright?

According to US copyright law, every published work before 1923 is in the public domain, with no exceptions: http://copyright.cornell.edu/resource...

Additionally, no one associated with the relevant title is still alive to submit. And many of these films are lost forever, so there is no commercial interest that would pay to display the posters or stills.

If there was ever a reason to have an exception to the current pay-for-poster rules, this is it, and would enhance the IMDb web site by allowing historical material to be added to pages for lost and/or historic films.

I hope you will consider this idea. Here is an example of what the site could have if the rules were revised:
Photo of David Eickemeyer

David Eickemeyer

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes

Posted 7 years ago

  • 18
Photo of Emperor

Emperor, Champion

  • 6418 Posts
  • 3021 Reply Likes
This is something I was thinking of suggesting for the reasons you say - not only are the images free to use but it is less likely to cannibalise IMDB's income from the poster service as everyone associated is dead and if a company is releasing it on DVD they'd still want to pay to upload the cover. It would greatly expand the number of images for older films, which, beyond the few popular ones, have no image at all.

I also think they might want to think about opening up photograph additions for adding images of people who have died. On Wikipedia the policy is that you need to have free to use photographs of living people but once someone is dead you can use an old one under fair use. Again this wouldn't cannibalise IMDB's income much, as most dead people aren't interested in paying for IMDB's services in order to further their career.

Both of these changes would allow more images to be added, which would help improve the look, feel and usefulness, further boosting IMDB place as the leading resources for film information.

So I'd +2 this if I could ;)
Photo of Emperor

Emperor, Champion

  • 6418 Posts
  • 3021 Reply Likes
I also think that if you were to post a link to this in the Contributor Help forum you'd get a lot more interest and input.
Photo of Michael

Michael

  • 2 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
Agreed, there could be much support for allowing 1-3 images for deceased members of the industry in memoriam. Respectful and agreed, no real copyright issue if it's posted by a relative. Please keep me posted on any updates / changes to this issue.
Photo of TechArtisan

TechArtisan

  • 2 Posts
  • 1 Reply Like
I believe it is a crying shame that deceased stars can't even have a fan-posted HEAD SHOT and have a stupid oval next to their name. I have been a member & follower of IMDB since the '90s and once it became "a business" rather than a repository or library everything changed.  Well, as noted here by others, everything begins with $$$ and that is why this gets short-shrift.  Maybe we have to take this issue up with AMAZON, as they seem to be the parent business organization that runs this.  In fact, they could run the number of "dead 10 years or more" as a public service library - separate database, but still researchable via IMDB - with different rules.  It would take them about 4 days to accomplish because the data is already assembled in the IMDB query format.  I have posted Nancy Walker to my FB page trying to get others to petition.  Any fellow petitioners reading this are more than welcome. Thanks! 
Ref: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0908055/?ref_=nv_sr_1 
Photo of Tom

Tom, Official Rep

  • 207 Posts
  • 109 Reply Likes
Hi David, thank you for this suggestion and apologies you've had to wait so long for a response. I just wanted to give you an update that we are exploring the idea of creating a new mechanism to allow users to upload images (beyond Poster Services). Unfortunately I don't have any specifics to share yet, but I'll update you on here as soon as we do.

Best,
Tom
Photo of bluesmanSF

bluesmanSF, Champion

  • 10815 Posts
  • 6434 Reply Likes
Tom,

Thanks for that update. Any more news to share?
Photo of Jamie Menutis Smith

Jamie Menutis Smith

  • 1 Post
  • 2 Reply Likes
Tpm, Please let me know, I am also trying to finish the page for my deceased sister, Marika Menutis. I would like to add a photo, it is strictly something for historical purposes. Please let me know when IMDB decides if a single picture of a deceased person can be added without having to join the Pro Services. Thanks. Jamie
Photo of Stephanie Ross

Stephanie Ross

  • 4 Posts
  • 2 Reply Likes
I just want to be able to post a pic of my grandfather who is deceased for some time now. I am proud to be able to call Angelo Ross my grandfather and think it's a shame that I would have to pay every year just to show his picture for the world to see. I am a single mom of 2 and can't afford the fee just to have his pictures posted. Maybe this will change sometime soon.
Photo of bluesmanSF

bluesmanSF, Champion

  • 10815 Posts
  • 6434 Reply Likes
I don't think anyone is suggesting you should have IMDbPro, the resume and photo service IMDb offers, if there's no reason (as in, you're not in 'the business'). As I explained in the other thread, it's simply the only way to add a head shot, at this time (but note that staff marked this thread as "under consideration," which means they're thinking of working out a new system). I don't mean to have implied you should pay for a subscription.

It appears you did not add a vote. I'd click the "like" button above to indicate support for the idea.
(Edited)

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.