There was a vote cheating on your site

  • 1
  • Question
  • Updated 3 months ago
  • Answered
The rating of the film "Crimea" (2017) on IMDb was seriously wound up. At the moment, it is 6.9, which is the result of the mass rating of high ratings on the film page. At the same time, a large number of ratings of 9 (65.7%) put to the film are doubtful. In addition, demographic statistics (rating by age, gender, country) contradicts the average rating of the film. Well, for comparison, the statistics of the film "Crimea" on KinoPoisk (Russian analogue of IMDb), where the rating is consistent with the statistics. Please pay attention to this problem and fix the error.


Photo of artemt56

artemt56

  • 1 Post
  • 0 Reply Likes

Posted 4 months ago

  • 1
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23099 Posts
  • 27408 Reply Likes

This is not an official reply. IMDb is going to reply with the standard answer. That will be that the weighted average formula in use will counteract any vote stuffing and they will refer you to a URL Link FAQ.

But here is the observation that I believe is the reason that the rating is high. Imdb's "Formula"/Software algorithm has been "Figured" out by those individuals that understand that ten votes are literally not counted. So they have "Figured" it out and stuffed the voting with 9s instead so as to game the system.

What IMDb does now will be interesting.

I have been advocating that no new accounts be allowed to cast votes, or at the very least, accounts that are created and do not show a discernible voting pattern. (Like a vote on varied titles over time) that those accounts be flagged and their votes be disqualified.

They need to address account abuse, not the discounting of votes based on what that rating number is/was. Account verification by way of sending a text code to a cell phone or a voice code for land lines. The system could identify that phone number as already used and not allow the creation of multiple accounts based off of one number. The weighted average system would no longer need to be tweaked or to be needed at all.
Photo of Marco

Marco

  • 1628 Posts
  • 2074 Reply Likes
Photo of Joel

Joel, Official Rep

  • 1204 Posts
  • 1685 Reply Likes
Hi Artemt56,

Thanks for the post.

Please see the conversation Ed Jones has provided before for more context. 

I've passed the feedback from this onto the necessary team now.

Cheers,

Joel 
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23099 Posts
  • 27408 Reply Likes
Joel, here is hoping that a better system is developed. If not the weighted average system eventually will become ineffective.
Thanks for reading my reply and comprehending the logic behind it.
:):)