User Reviews on Johnny Test (TV Series 2005–2014)

  • 2
  • Question
  • Updated 8 months ago
  • Answered
  • (Edited)
  • 2
Concerns regarding the Johnny Test (TV Series 2005–2014)
  • However, the popularity has reached lowest rate to 4.470 (↓111).
  • Here is most screen capture of Johnny Test's Ratings:

  • Mostly, they criticized the TV Series title as bad show and now bad example of animation. Is not good news, but is better to resolve the issue if is possible. 
Photo of Web SYS

Web SYS

  • 8 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
  • concerned

Posted 8 months ago

  • 2
8 months ago
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23152 Posts
  • 27468 Reply Likes
Hi Web SYS. Sorry. Please clarify. Resolve what issue? There appears to be no issue.
Everything looks fine.
2019-11-28T16:28:37+00:00
Photo of Web SYS

Web SYS

  • 8 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
Negative votes 1.454 for Johnny Test. This serial has been not updated recently.
(Edited)
2019-11-28T16:32:15+00:00
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23152 Posts
  • 27468 Reply Likes
In what way?
2019-11-28T16:38:51+00:00
Photo of Web SYS

Web SYS

  • 8 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
Draw the attention on the main TV Serial here. It has the lowest popularity that is highlighted as 4.470 (↓111).
(Edited)
8 months ago
Photo of bderoes

bderoes, Champion

  • 2302 Posts
  • 3789 Reply Likes
This graphic:

shows 2 unrelated statistics.
The title has 82 user reviews (and 1 linked external critic's review)
and the title has a drop in popularity.
But the reviews and the popularity are not directly related.
Popularity is a measure of the number of visits to the page in comparison to visits to other titles on IMDb.
A title can drop in popularity just because other titles rise.

A related Help article:
What’s the difference between the MOVIEmeter and popularity ranking on a title?
8 months ago
Photo of Web SYS

Web SYS

  • 8 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
See example of reviews:


If we look that the reviews are poor and critical, then this result in most prolific reviewer. Bigger trouble for that title.
8 months ago
Photo of bderoes

bderoes, Champion

  • 2302 Posts
  • 3789 Reply Likes
People are entitled to their opinions. 

I don't follow your comment about prolific reviewers. Being prolific is a measure of the number of reviews posted for all the titles a reviewer writes about. Someone who has reviewed 1000 titles is more prolific than someone who's reviewed 999 titles.
8 months ago
Photo of Web SYS

Web SYS

  • 8 Posts
  • 4 Reply Likes
Sorry for that. I were wrong about prolific reviewers, as I've forgot Filter by Rating.
8 months ago
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23152 Posts
  • 27468 Reply Likes
You have gotten off topic.
I see what you are pointing out. While ratings are in play for what you have highlited. Making visual aids for the ratings and the average ratings was not necessary and confused the issue.

What you are referencing is the MOVIEmeter.
That compares its popularity to every other title in the database.
Bderoes has a link in his reply that explains it completely.
8 months ago
Photo of Jaime

Jaime, Employee

  • 689 Posts
  • 931 Reply Likes
Hi there,

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
                                       
Our voting system already detects and defeats attempts to stuff the ballot and skew the rating, as demonstrated by the difference between the weighted average and the arithmetic mean on the vast majority of titles in the database.
                                       
Our voting system is continually improved in this respect so you can rest assured that abuse is always automatically detected and thwarted.
                                       
We hope this addresses your concerns. Thank you for your support.
  • 2

Powered by Get Satisfaction