It makes sense that the system might not allow synopses that are too short to be created to begin with, but why are the are "not long enough" ones imported from the old system situated in such a way that, in order to edit them, additional information must be added, lest the submission not be able to be made at all?! This is absurd! Why didn't the designer make it so that minor corrections could still be submitted?! Never mind the answer to that, so much as the following. If IMDb web development team will not fix this, then why in the hell not?!
The changes that have been being made in the past several months are breaking the site!
The changes that have been being made in the past several months are breaking the site!
- 7420 Posts
- 9838 Reply Likes
- dissatisfied.
Posted 3 years ago
Peter, Champion
- 8105 Posts
- 10484 Reply Likes
That sounds like normal behaviour of the update system: You can often only correct something if you can amend it so that it's accepted by the form (e.g., a series-level credit or a badly formatted aka).
Col Needham, Official Rep
- 6866 Posts
- 4909 Reply Likes
As Peter indicates above, this is the expected behaviour, sorry.
If you find an existing synopsis which is too short when edited, you can either:
If you find an existing synopsis which is too short when edited, you can either:
- Edit the synopsis and expand it until it is long enough OR
- Submit the text as a plot summary instead (removing any spoilers) and then submit a delete request for the original synopsis
- 7420 Posts
- 9838 Reply Likes
How about I ask the IMDb staff to make the corrections?
- 7420 Posts
- 9838 Reply Likes
O, by the way, please take note of the junk that had to be deleted for Diary of a Single Mom (2009-2011): 171023-114220-298000. Why was the rubbish imported in the first place if it would not meet guidelines?! Do you sincerely take pride in your website? I'm sure people ask that question all time, but somehow corresponding affirmations continually come off as unconvincing, which is thanks to the behavior of your company overall.
Col Needham, Official Rep
- 6866 Posts
- 4909 Reply Likes
Please see https://contribute.imdb.com/charter
- 1812 Posts
- 2374 Reply Likes
Maybe it’s you that should ”move along” Jeorj. With that attitude of yours, it’s amazing that you get any answers at all. Shame on you buddy.
- 7420 Posts
- 9838 Reply Likes
Well, my patience is running thin over time. As the site changes, so too do I.
- 7420 Posts
- 9838 Reply Likes
It is also interesting to hear from people I've never heard from before too, when the subject matter is that of unsightly attitudes. Very interesting.
Related Categories
-
Data Issues & Policy Discussions
- 29910 Conversations
- 4494 Followers





Jeorj Euler
Peter, Champion
Jeorj Euler
Peter, Champion