Why is Ed Jonz allowed to troll on here? Here he is insulting & attacking me randomly

  • 4
  • Question
  • Updated 4 months ago
  • Answered
This creep needs to seriously be phased out of here! I understand he is a troll and he has been sacked out of here 3 times.

Here is where this trash is  trolling me: Please see his provoking me and attacking me ending with "you will have taken this reply as an affront to your intelligence" in his post preceding mine here:

https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/declined-its-the-whole-gay-thing-isnt-it?topic-reply-list[settings][filter_by]=all&topic-reply-list[settings][reply_id]=20441204#reply_20441204

I submitted a goof, complete with video. As I explained there, it is a goof because:

1) Fran Fine is having her gay pal give her his "queer eye" fashion advice.
2) She undresses in front of him cos he's gay.
3) She finds out he's straight WHILE WEARING THE RED DRESS. 
4) She is embarassed because she UNDRESSED IN FRONT OF HIM!

4) Cut to commercial.

5) Come back from commercial: she is now undressed and in her underwear again!


And that makes no sense which is why I submitted this as goof. This clown Ed Jonz went on a tirade attacking me because he thinks English is my 2nd language. It is actually my 4th. But apparently, according to this agent provocateur, I'm not bright enough to get the humor??


GOOF I SUBMITTED:
GOOF ADDITION: When the scene fades to black for commercial, Fran has just found out that Kurt, the male nanny, is not gay. She was then wearing a red dress with cutouts in her cleavage, stomach and inner elbow areas. Kurt had then started kissing her, and the camera faded to black upon her screaming: "Oh, my God! You're not gay?!". However, when the scene returns from commercial break, Fran is now in her bra and pantyhose. Since she found out he is a heterosexual before removing her clothes to try on the next dress for his fashion opinion, she then had no further reason to do so. No valid reason is given as to why the nanny got undressed in her room with this man, after finding out he's straight, since she is so upset by that fact, as they're not dating. As written, this made no sense. Character error

No it isn't "too long", there is no other way to word this and make sense without seeing the video:  See minute 13: https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6q74a8


I side with Jim when I say: please PERMANENTLY ban this complete tool out of GetSatisfaction. There are industry professionals I've seen him attack time and again. Ed Jones is making IMDb lose money by causing users to cancel their pro account. 
Photo of Appraiser1

Appraiser1

  • 253 Posts
  • 263 Reply Likes
  • baffled by Ed Jones stupidity and malice!

Posted 4 months ago

  • 4
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23067 Posts
  • 27330 Reply Likes
Please refer to the get satisfaction T.O.U.
Name calling is not allowed.
Adrian a Champion pointed out the same thing I did
Your contribution exceeded the 400 character limit.

Your contribution also was flawed because your concept of the humor presented was completely not understood by you.
When I pointed out your lack of understanding of the humor at play you make this posting up.
IMDb rightly rejected it as unverifiable.
So, no sir that is not trolling.
That is helping another contributor to see an error and to hope that they think twice about submitting irrelevant data to this database.
You are simply upset that one would point out your mistake.
It's not possible that you could be wrong so you make this post and call me names.


IMDb Staff please read the poorly written goof submission here.
It was rightly rejected by staff.
The submitter has no concept of censored American television content and mistakes this as a continuity issue and a goof.
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/declined-its-the-whole-gay-thing-isnt-it



Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23067 Posts
  • 27330 Reply Likes
.
Photo of Appraiser1

Appraiser1

  • 253 Posts
  • 263 Reply Likes
Take your Midol: you are out of control. No one cares about your Petty Mood Swings, ed.
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23067 Posts
  • 27330 Reply Likes
.
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23067 Posts
  • 27330 Reply Likes
.
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23067 Posts
  • 27330 Reply Likes
A reminder.
You have been advised on the 400 character limit once already.

https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/why-has-my-jerry-lewis-contribution-been-declined-5-times

You have been advised about a lot of things.





(Edited)
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23067 Posts
  • 27330 Reply Likes
.
Photo of Appraiser1

Appraiser1

  • 253 Posts
  • 263 Reply Likes
You really need to seek mental help for your desperate need to "have the last word" and your pugnacious derangement syndrome to troll others when they have done absolutely nothing to you. Here have a ".". Have three: ...
(Edited)
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23067 Posts
  • 27330 Reply Likes
They are not replies.
They just lock in evidence of your poor behavior so you cannot remove it.
There are non replies. They are not the last word.
The only injustice here is that Jimthing, Filmfanatic10, and yourself are very rude and cannot control your vitriolic diatribe and whether you care to admit or see it. Your contributions as a whole are questionable. All three of you need an audit of your body of work.
If what I've witnessed here on this forum is any indication of all three of your submissions, and your lack of comprehension of IMDb rules and guidelines, then I ask that a ticket by IMDB Staff be opened into all 3 of yours submission histories.

The data that you all have submitted is questionable.
(Edited)
Photo of Appraiser1

Appraiser1

  • 253 Posts
  • 263 Reply Likes
You clearly have delusions of grandeur. (Look it up, sweetheart!) I ain't deleting squat! I am very proud of having called you what you truly are: a TROLL, as Jim, and evidently countless others have. Here is proof of what a B-word you are (see photo). 

I challenge ANYONE to watch that episode and side with you. Kurt (the non-gay guy) is still kissing the nanny, trying to seduce her. If you cleaned out your ears, you'd understand that. If you think a tryst was implied in a family show while her door was wide open and the kids could have walked in, you really need to put your crack pipe down and go to detox before you ever attempt to "help" anyone else on here. 

I posed a question, your imbecilic response (pasted below) was uncalled for. To call you an imbecile would be  a tribute to everyone you have attacked, bullied and driven away from here. But I won't do so, even though clearly you are one: I"m sticking with calling you a deluded troll. You can pore over my history, I have nothing to hide. I am a top contributor on here.
Good luck with that: I have close to 2000 entries, most of them were pending and double checked. 

If my calling you out on your despicable behavior and your transphobic attacks get me banned out of here and IMDb's website, it will be their loss. Unlike you, I have a life. I'm not a blood sucker whose worthless existence only gets replenished by insulting random people who HELLO come here for help.

Your worthless life has zero meaning. You, as a classic troll, seek your self-worth in provoking others and getting a reaction. I have proven before that I don't cower and I am not afraid to respond. If that gets me banned forever, you can throw confetti on top of your own pathetic head & vape some more meth. I'm sure there will be others for you to do it again. I'm not on here long enough for you to bloodsuck to your heart's content. 

Again, you have been banned thrice. It's time for this ban to kick you permanently out of here! 

You'll do it again to others. IMDb mods: mark my words. 
Photo of Ed Jones(XLIX)

Ed Jones(XLIX)

  • 23067 Posts
  • 27330 Reply Likes
.
Photo of Uberhamster

Uberhamster

  • 47 Posts
  • 51 Reply Likes
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled Problem with another user (staff please intervene).

Note to IMDb Staff

Please intervene. I asked a question 3 weeks ago and now this one user can't stop himself from commenting, but he isn't helping at all. He's not coming up with rules/guidelines/reasons to do with the question, etc.

He's now posting requests to you the staff to merge the topic with another one even though it makes no sense (because one is about theatrical releases and the other one abut one specific TV program).

https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/topics/hallmark-hall-of-fame-episodes-are-all-listed-as-tv-movies

He's got something against episodes and is disrupting the whole question by claiming stuff that isn't actually relevant if you check it.
(In fact that's vaguely familiar, I think he's been against anything having a sub-layer for episodes, ever since the IMDB introduced that almost 15(!) years ago.)

Please tell this user to leave the topic alone for a while.
Photo of Steve

Steve, Official Rep

  • 1807 Posts
  • 1423 Reply Likes
Official Response
IMDb has heard and will address your concerns.

We humbly ask all users to treat one another with respect and dignity. Should you have any concerns, please contact our team directly:

https://help.imdb.com/contact

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.