Last.fm's Awful Relaunch Makes the News

  • 0
  • 22
  • Question
  • Updated 4 years ago
  • Doesn't Need an Answer
Archived and Closed

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies and is no longer visible to community members. The community moderator provided the following reason for archiving: This thread ran it's course

Photo of Seederman

Seederman

  • 50 Posts
  • 177 Reply Likes
  • lulzy

Posted 4 years ago

  • 0
  • 22
Photo of Tuomas Järvenpää

Tuomas Järvenpää

  • 8 Posts
  • 37 Reply Likes
Fucking fantastic. 
Photo of Svetlana Stričević

Svetlana Stričević

  • 315 Posts
  • 583 Reply Likes
freaking circus.... T_T
Photo of stephen

stephen

  • 60 Posts
  • 346 Reply Likes
"The new design is certainly nowhere near as bad as some users are making out"



What an idiot. Has this guy ever even used the site before? It's barely functional. Missing huge features and what scarce features are left are either changed for the worse (ie friends now being followers for no reason) or completely broken. Even when it's "fixed" it will be just another big, stupid website with no functionality whatsoever. Considering there is no satisfactory competitor most of us are left to either try to work on the new shitty site or give up entirely. 


That said, I'm glad there's some negative press about the site. The arrogant dolts running the site deserve to lose their jobs for who bad they handled this. 
Photo of scarletsong

scarletsong

  • 72 Posts
  • 136 Reply Likes
They probably think we're all crying because we don't like the specific shade of red they used or something. Nevermind all the features that are missing or broken, and the complete lack of communication.
Photo of Whispered X (Spineshank155)

Whispered X (Spineshank155)

  • 166 Posts
  • 375 Reply Likes
If they bothered to READ the complaints, maybe they could understand where we are coming from, but the new site was rushed out without even ironing all the bugs yet. I think CBS is quickly trying to kill last.fm, ever since they bought out last.fm they have been slowly dismantling it and now with this new site i think they finally will succeed.
Photo of Rainey Dawn

Rainey Dawn

  • 43 Posts
  • 34 Reply Likes
Thanks for the article link!!!
Photo of Alexei Gudimenko

Alexei Gudimenko

  • 9 Posts
  • 10 Reply Likes
- no functionality? C'mon, now really?

- you can scrobble from a ton of players (all my players still work - SmartPlayer, Vox (iOS/Mac OS X), Itunes, Winamp, etc). 
- your library is still available, and there are more views that you can observe. 
- artist profiles are present, just as before. 

In fact, a good portion of the key features is still around, and a lot of the features that haven't been initially available have been switched on since. 

What has in reality been handled terribly is the communication with the fan-base, and launching what was technically a beta site with a number of unfixed issues, rather than a proper RTM build. Meh, - it's annoying but in no way an end of the world. Most of the library/scrobble-count issues have been fixed; the FLAC scrobbling issues that some players experienced have been fixed; there have been changes to keep the new look but make the library views more intuitive, etc. 

I would have absolutely loved some proper engagement with the community - at least to detail the reasons why some changes have been made and the direction the site aims to go in; there are also a lot of things I'd like to see implemented in the future. It's not all perfect. But hardly worth the dramatic, Hamlet-like posing of "my world just ended". 
Photo of Randy Roley

Randy Roley

  • 11 Posts
  • 6 Reply Likes
I agree with all of the communications issues could be handled much better and yes, I am also able to do much of the scrobbling from various sources however, some of the sources have to be looked into. Some scrobblers no longer scrobble for me even though my last.fm account is still in sync with the like www.ibroadcast.com I was up till the release of the new last.fm able to scrobble all my music from there. Now, I cannot. Live Radio Station streams are no longer able to be scrobbled from clementine media player...I used to be able to up till the release of the new site.  However, I agree the forums and groups should return...and they are promising their return. Sure, it might not happen with the magical wave of a Magician's wand but sooner or later, I am certain of it that we will see these old features returning back to last.fm. As for the new design itself? I see nothing totally wrong with it other than the fixes which still need mended. As well as the need for the return of the old features we have always enjoyed. However, at least from my own point of view, having once had to undergo cataract surgeries in both eyes few years ago....I can honestly say that I prefer the new, colorful look better because the darker backgrounds are 100% easier on my eyes than the all white backgrounds on literally every page on last.fm and with these darker backgrounds and so forth, I get lesser eye strain and headaches. So, that part alone is a big plus in my own opinion (at least for me it is.) Also, I do believe people are being too harsh with the Developers....They are doing what they have to in order to make everything right and like the comment-er above has stated: there is allot of fixes which have already been made since the beta release. Some fixes  take much longer than others to mend. I am waiting it all out to see what they do and if they carry out their promises to bring back the old features with improvements. At the moment, I do not see any reason why they would not do as they are promising to do. I will sit back and watch how they manage to pull this all off...Let's see what they do. In the meantime, I am still scrobbling away like I have been doing since 2013!
Photo of SpaceOctopus

SpaceOctopus

  • 3 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
No. Simply bull. The site is completely different and core features have been changed (for the worse) or removed. I realize there are a lot of people who scrobble, and that's cool and all, but really what is the point of doing that if you're not getting music recommendations that are helpful to find new music? 4 similar songs on a page does not count. That is simply bullshit. I've been using this service for too long, longer than I care to even count (it's probably been something like a decade or close) and there's not a single thing left that I would ever bother even using.
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 563 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
Am I the only person that hears the obvious sarcasm in that post?

If they were on your side, do you really think one of the quotes they'd use would be describing it as "a cross between late-period Myspace and 9/11"?

They're basically making you guys out to be drama queens.
Photo of runeii

runeii

  • 250 Posts
  • 408 Reply Likes
It's a news site. Do you think they're going to be entirely truthful?
(Edited)
Photo of Seederman

Seederman

  • 50 Posts
  • 177 Reply Likes
They can call me a drama queen if they want to, I don't care.

The headline does not say "Fantastic New Redesign at Last.fm!!!"

It could have said that; the ball has been in last.fm's court all along.  The users are just drama queens, we can't affect anything.  Last.fm blew their first story about the redesign; they earned it.
(Edited)
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 563 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
Besides the point. The last guys said "I'm glad there's some negative press about the site".  All I see is negative press about the users.

I bet you that anyone coming to last.fm for the first time in the next few days (once the bugs are ironed out) won't see a problem with the design.  The main issues people have are losing things they're used to.

So who's going to be convinced by this negative press? The people who already didn't like it?
(Edited)
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 563 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
'The headline does not say "Fantastic New Redesign at Last.fm!!!"'

Of course it doesn't. They're a news site, not a blog written by a 5 year old.
Photo of stephen

stephen

  • 60 Posts
  • 346 Reply Likes
They were just highlighting the negative reaction you are reading way too much into it by trying to claim it was sarcastic. seriously how often do news sites outside of the onion even post "sarcastic" stories  
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 563 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
Are you kidding me?  They could have picked any number of quotes to highlight the point that people don't like it. There are literally thousands to choose from and some are beautifully written. But they write this:

'One user wrote: "this is unironically the worst thing that has EVER happened", while another went so far as to describe it as "a cross between late-period Myspace and 9/11".'

Especially when the very next line is "The new design is certainly nowhere near as bad as some users are making out".


And news sites never post "sarcastic" stories? http://www.buzzfeed.com/tommywilhelm/the-facebook-timeline-of-facebook-backlashes#.ey7Vx1DQA

Buzzfeed not a real news site?  Ok, sure: http://www.pcworld.com/article/240327/facebook_redesigns_a_long_history_of_pointless_backlash.html

The only 3 constants in life are death, taxes, and people getting angry at website redesigns ;-)
(Edited)
Photo of Cassandra-Leo

Cassandra-Leo

  • 118 Posts
  • 253 Reply Likes
That's because a user being quoted compared the site to 9/11 and said it was the worst thing ever. That doesn't mean the author doesn't still think the redesign is bad. None of Facebook's relaunches ever had 80% of the core features completely missing. This isn't even remotely comparable to most other website relaunches. It's substantially worse.
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 563 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
And you don't think comparing it to 9/11 could be seen as, y'know, a bit... dramatic?

And come on now. 80% of core features?  I can still scrobble, recommendations, artist pages and event search is still there. What are the other 20 core features that are missing?

I'm not saying things aren't a bit ropey right now, and I wholeheartedly agree that there are bugs that need addressing.  But 80% of core features missing?  I want some of what you're smoking my friend, it sounds ace.
Photo of Cassandra-Leo

Cassandra-Leo

  • 118 Posts
  • 253 Reply Likes
Of course I think it's dramatic; that's why I mentioned it. If you can't read my subtext, why do you think you're reading the Digital Spy piece's subtext correctly?

No groups. No shoutbox. Can't view old shouts. All shouts from the last month are missing. No journals. No neighbours. No Taste-O-Meter. Can't love or delete tracks. Can't tag. Can't view your tags. Duplicate scrobbles deleted shortly before the relaunch have come back with a vengeance. Many users are missing thousands or tens or even hundreds of thousands of scrobbles. Can't upload album art. Can't view alternate album art. Can't display images in About Me section. 200 characters plain text is nowhere near enough space to describe yourself. Can only display 5 artists, 10 songs, and 5 albums on main page. Artists added to library with 0 scrobbles are missing. Event history is missing. API authentication doesn't work. Universal Scrobbler and other addons are now broken. Can't recover passwords. Library doesn't display list of albums from which you listened to a track. Library doesn't even load correctly about 20% of the time I load it. I could go on. Scrobbling, recommendations, and artist pages are nearly the only things that still work at all, and even those are missing a lot of features and/or aren't always working properly. Seriously, you think more than 20% of the site is working correctly, and you're accusing me of being on drugs? I have literally, not figuratively, never seen a site relaunch with this many broken or missing features before.
(Edited)
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 563 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
A lot of those things I wouldn't call core features. They may be important to some users, but they're certainly not core.  The API cock ups are the biggies really, and although it's no excuse, they have acknowledged the issue so I'd hope they'll be fixed in the next few days.

Missing scrobbles is weird. But all the data will still be stored, and I'd expect it'll be fixed soon. If they've actually *lost* scrobbles, then I'll be the first to admit they failed hard.

"I have literally, not figuratively, never seen a site relaunch with this many broken or missing features before."

This I agree with.  And I say that as a developer who's been involved in a couple of large scale redesigns in the last 10 years.  Even I find it hard to sympathise with how poorly they managed this, but I've been in the position of having senior management telling us to launch before it's ready because they promised someone else it'd be launched that date. It's ridiculous, but sadly, it happens.

The upside to all of this is it shows CBS are at least willing to put some money into the site, and there's at least a small dev team working on things, so hopefully as things die down and the bugs are fixed we'll start seeing some of the older, lower priority features being re-added. Especially the useful ones.  I'm going to stay optimistic until they give me a reason not to!
Photo of Cassandra-Leo

Cassandra-Leo

  • 118 Posts
  • 253 Reply Likes
You wouldn't call password recovery, groups, recent shouts, etc., core features? 'Cause if you can't log into the site, I'd say that's pretty damn important. And half of what made last.fm interesting to me was being able to interact with other users on the site. I literally cannot do that in any way whatsoever now.

I wouldn't be surprised if the redesign was forced on the dev team by corporate higher-ups either, but frankly, that doesn't give me any reason for optimism, because firstly it shows that the people calling the shots have no idea how to manage a site like this, and secondly we've been giving feedback on the beta for literally months and nearly nothing has changed since then, which shows a staggering slowness to the dev team's responses. Judging from recent progress, I don't expect half of this stuff to be fixed within the next six months. The site will be a ghost town by then.
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 563 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
To quote myself: "A lot of those things I wouldn't call core features".  Not all!

Shoutboxes are back tomorrow. PMs are already back. I'd be amazed if forums were gone for good - the fact that the forum url is returning a 502 error suggests the server it's running on is having issues, rather than having been killed completely.

Can't say I know too much about the beta feedback - I've been using it for a month and really liked the new design but never gave any feedback.

Though I was shocked it was launched when it was - I thought there was at least another few weeks work there, but then I have no idea how big their dev team is nowadays.  I know a guy who worked there for 5 years - I must remember to hit him up tomorrow to see what his reaction to all this is. I suspect he won't be happy.
Photo of Cassandra-Leo

Cassandra-Leo

  • 118 Posts
  • 253 Reply Likes
You also said "The API cock ups are the biggies really", implying that you didn't think anything else was particularly important. There are quite a few other crucial features missing.
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 563 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
Sorry, didn't mean to confuse. TBH, I just didn't think a point by point rebuttal was particularly constructive, I figured you'd get my point.
Photo of Svetlana Stričević

Svetlana Stričević

  • 315 Posts
  • 583 Reply Likes
everything was important on old last.fm because it helped the best for MUSIC purpose which site was made for! Now it DOESN'T live up to that purpose! Those who used last.fm and cared for their music and statistic and libraries and recommends and finding and promotiing and communicating about music, those CAN understand how AWFUL and PLAIN is new version. Honestly who will use this?
Kids with Touch Screen Devices. 
No one else.
Artists won't invest in something that can't gain them recognition, and user who care about music won't come ince they won't find new music.
So yeah those ALL OLD FEATURES WERE CORE. If they Weren't that core, THERE WOULDN'T BE SO MUCH OPOSERS even from old quiet users who never came to say something about last.fm, as me.
It's like someone is playing game; ho to destroy last.fm and its purpose forever.
Photo of Whispered X (Spineshank155)

Whispered X (Spineshank155)

  • 166 Posts
  • 375 Reply Likes
It makes no sense to roll out the new site if it is not finished yet. I don't mind that certain features are inactive due to them performing the changes but it's them rolling this new site out before it is even completed.

It's ridiculous that they didn't include the old sidebar or many of the other features the old site has but now we're all forced to use the new site when it isn't even done yet!

I had my profile setup in a way i wanted it to be and last.fm trashed it. This tells me they don't care about my scrobbles or my activity and i'm better served elsewhere. I'm going to wait for a new site to come around because i don't have any respect for last.fm anymore. They can do what they want but i won't be a part on this site if they choose to ignore the people that are on this site all for changing the site. It's ridiculous and it's terribly implemented. Maybe they should take pointers from Facebook, because when they rolled out the new site they didn't leave a bunch of features out, they rolled out the new site pretty well minus the fact they removed a few good functionality of the site.

But this new last.fm site is horrible. Who would have thought this was good enough for a launch? This is like when buying a new car they don't include the steering wheel, brakes or airconditioning. Oh well you don't need air conditioning because you can just roll down the windows. Oh the power window buttons won't be installed for another week. This is how last.fm's new site is. it's a poorly executed mess. Not to mention they screwed with the about me and that is i think the worst thing they could have done so i don't think i'll be using this site unless they restore the about me to it's proper effect. I can deal with the inefficiencies of everything else but i need my bandlogos or no last.fm for me.
Photo of jusO6

jusO6

  • 80 Posts
  • 241 Reply Likes
I signed the petition!!! :D
Photo of Whispered X (Spineshank155)

Whispered X (Spineshank155)

  • 166 Posts
  • 375 Reply Likes
lol i reckon 20% of the last.fm users will be staying on while 80% (mainly those who have been writing code to put into 'about me' such as bandlogos) will be leaving last.fm.

Glad it made the news, but i don't think it will change back. Think this was CBS's plan all along.. just export my data and hopefully a better site will come around.. last.fm is dead.
Photo of Beatrice Albrechtʚɞ

Beatrice Albrechtʚɞ

  • 1 Post
  • 1 Reply Like
last.fm is dead. i agree. makes me sad as i aaalways loved this fantastic inspiring place.
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 563 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
Naaah, it's not dead. I bet you a pie and chips on Brighton beach that a few weeks from now the site will be looking a lot better.

I'll even throw in a ice cream... with 2 flakes!  That's how optimistic I am ;-)
Photo of Whispered X (Spineshank155)

Whispered X (Spineshank155)

  • 166 Posts
  • 375 Reply Likes
If CBS/Last.fm really cares or listens to feedback, it'll change quickly. People raised hell over the radio thing but that didn't solve anything and nothing was done to correct it. Last.fm kept it that way (even though i thought it wasn't a terrible mistake), if they don't do something soon to restore last.fm to it's former glory many people will leave the site. I'm not bothering to use the site at all until they fix these problems.. or if not some other site will do better.
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 563 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
I think there's a lot of overestimation of what the majority of people use the site for.  I'm not claiming to know 100%, but I'd bet my left leg that they have access to stats that tell them what the most important parts of the site are by usage.

IMO, this explains why recommendations, artist pages and event pages are working fine, and why messaging, journals, etc were shuffled back to lower priority.

Sure, people will leave.  Just like people left Facebook when it redesigned. But that doesn't mean the changes are bad, it just means some people don't like them.

But before you shout at me (you won't be the first!), let me state that I do agree the release plan was a bit of a shambles, and it definitely could have done with longer in development. I just don't think the site is "dead", as a lot are claiming.
Photo of Whispered X (Spineshank155)

Whispered X (Spineshank155)

  • 166 Posts
  • 375 Reply Likes
Last.fm has been dying for the past several years, i've seen listeners declining, people leaving the site and there just hasn't been that much activity in last.fm.

You look at a popular artist like Nickelback or Slipknot and i only see a couple of shouts a day. Even In Flames which supposedly has more listeners than Slipknot is often times completely dead.

I don't even want to scrobble because i feel like Last.fm doesn't listen to any of the feedback. I've seen people write and show pictures of what the site could look like and these people ignore them. Now the beta site has launched which is far from being finished and that to me is the final nail in the coffin.

200 characters for about me? And the fact that your old about me info is now gone. So i wasted time and effort into trying to make my music page look good. And now that's all going to waste. 5 artists on the main profile page is a joke.

I'm not shouting or angry at you i do respect you for your opinion but last.fm has been dying for the past several years and every time they make a huge change like removing the radio functionality in the desktop client and using youtube to stream the music. Along with other things they removed like custom radio and now they completely changed the site over. People didn't even like the bigger format they used when they did a redesign of the site the first time. I got used to all that but this is just taking it too far, removing the setup i had for my profile is the last straw here and i'm sure many others will agree that this was a stupid move by CBS or Last.fm. Whoever was in charge of pushing the beta site out wasn't thinking clearly.

The fact that the site is now unusable now i think the longer it's left in this state, even if they start putting some of the features back such as shoutboxes and inbox, people are going to leave the site. A huge chunk of activity went down, i don't recall where those stats are located and while scrobbling seems fine, i haven't scrobbled nor i plan on to. I am just tired of trying to fight for a site to change and im giving up on last.fm because they refuse to listen to feedback.

what is the point in having feedback if they are not going to even listen to it? That is where this site has gone wrong and that is where people will start to leave because if they can't even use the site the way they used to then it becomes useless to them. And already 80% of the commentators on here are complaining about the new design. The petition is up to 1,800 or so signatures and that's a higher number than what some of the more popular artists are getting on a weekly listen. I do keep tabs on this site and last.fm is losing activity and it's community.
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 563 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
Maybe you're right, and it's a shame if so. I would imagine that this update was an attempt to address that - I suspect they see their strengths more as a data source and recommendations engine.

And as sad as it is - and I say this from experience - community isn't where money is made. They most likely removed the native radio player because it make them bleed money with little to no return, whereas integrating with Youtube/Spotify gives them access to a bigger catalogue with little to no costs or overhead.

But hopefully you're wrong, and they'll realise that that having a committed, loyal user base is the key to having accurate data - what would Wikipedia be without it's users?  If so, hopefully we'll see some of the popular features returning over the next month or so once they've ironed out the glaring issues with the site.

And hey, they do mention "subscription changes" in their list of upcoming changes - and they can't be blind enough to think people will pay without a good reason, so maybe that's cause for optimism?
Photo of First Last

First Last

  • 202 Posts
  • 433 Reply Likes
I dunno. People are canceling their subscriptions and posting the receipts here, so that doesn't bode well. After watching the staff go from on point to absent in a matter of two years, I have lost faith.
Photo of Whispered X (Spineshank155)

Whispered X (Spineshank155)

  • 166 Posts
  • 375 Reply Likes
As much as i want last.fm to work, i find them not listening to the feedback a big problem and this is a problem for many of the sites such as facebook, myspace or whatever that has made absurd changes that people don't like and they get away with it.

To be honest, i have more faith and optimism that a new site will come around and be better than what last.fm will ever be. Last.fm has been nearly completely destroyed and my charts are just nothing more than something that can be changed around. I'm glad i never had a subscription, i had considered one but thankfully i never actually went through with it. Ever since i joined the site, it was great at first there was some activity, enough to keep me interested but since Last.fm has made changes that activity has gone downhill. Some people have recently joined last.fm but i fear those people are going to leave as well.

Had they left the beta site in beta or at the very least give users the option to switch back, or at the very least listen to the feedback. Everything is dictated these days where we don't have any rights to tell a company or a website that these changes do not work and they will lose people over it if they do not listen and in reality they would listen to the feedback.

You can't change the weather but you can change technology and when technology isn't working in the best interest of it's community members then what good is it?

I really do not understand why they rolled this out without making sure all or most of the features were still there, my last.fm profile is now incomplete because of this, and i'm supposed to work with it? It just or should not work that way and this is a change that i can't deal with so the only option is to leave and wait for something better.

Great if you want to stick around but if this is the future of last.fm i don't want it. And it's total BS that CBS doesn't care about feedback unless it's a bug.
Photo of First Last

First Last

  • 202 Posts
  • 433 Reply Likes
I think if we all band together, we could make this happen rather than waiting for somebody else to do it...
Photo of Whispered X (Spineshank155)

Whispered X (Spineshank155)

  • 166 Posts
  • 375 Reply Likes
Well my last.fm profile will be gone in a month, i am not even scrobbling. Not giving these people any reason to continue to do what they are doing. I'm plastering all over social media on how they screwed the last.fm community with this abhorant cheap change.
Photo of First Last

First Last

  • 202 Posts
  • 433 Reply Likes
I can't scrobble. I use an 3rd-party iPhone app, and now it's broken thanks to the authentication problems. Whoopie...
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 563 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
I'm still managing to scrobble, and it seems a fair few others are too - according to their new Live page, there have been around 25000 scrobbles in the few seconds it took me to type this!

In fact, I'm scrobbling from a Google Music desktop player using a third party scrobbler. Wonder why you're hitting auth issues and I'm not?  Weird.
Photo of First Last

First Last

  • 202 Posts
  • 433 Reply Likes
Photo of nononsense

nononsense

  • 4 Posts
  • 21 Reply Likes
Must be cool to get to work on something with the intention of completely destroying it. Somebody razed my music website and replaced it with a Disney nightmare. Community is indeed a dead word.
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 563 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
Not to sound like a broken record here, but no company pumps thousands of man hours into a full site redesign - even going as far as publishing a beta site to keep people updated - with the intention of destroying it.

That's just not how business works. They clearly have a plan - whether or not than plan is utter horsesh*it, only time will tell. But I doubt very much their intention is to kill it. Not now, anyway.
Photo of First Last

First Last

  • 202 Posts
  • 433 Reply Likes
Thousands of man-hours? They took the CNET template and used it here. Then disabled all the features because it's easier to maintain.
(Edited)
Photo of Whispered X (Spineshank155)

Whispered X (Spineshank155)

  • 166 Posts
  • 375 Reply Likes
If their intention wasn't to kill last.fm they should be listening to feedback which they have been ignoring for the past several years. What was the point in even offering feedback if you are not going to make any changes or wait until the redesign is finished before launching it?

This is so horribly planned out that it's almost their intention to kill the site.

200 characters for about me and erasing what i had set up over the years, yeah they care so much about keeping your listening data that they completely ignored everything else in this redesign.

The new site is nowhere near ready for launch but Last.fm is quickly becoming Microsoft, launching products before it is finished and this is where their reputation goes under. It's one thing that my inbox/shoutbox is disabled but it's another that half of the site is still unfinished or not coming back.

Last.fm doesn't want to listen to feedback, well that's when people start leaving and sadly people have already been leaving last.fm over the years and this particular one is where last.fm may never recover from.
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 563 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
They first launched the beta in April. Let's say for argument's sake, they started work in March. That's 5 months.

22 working days in a month = 110 days.

7.5 hours in a working day = 825 hours. *per developer*.  All estimates, but reasonable estimates I think.

Unless you think CBS have been paying people to sit at home - perhaps you're right, but you'd be guessing. Paying people to actually do work makes a lot more sense.
Photo of First Last

First Last

  • 202 Posts
  • 433 Reply Likes
And what did those developers do in those 5 months, because the beta didn't change.
Photo of Whispered X (Spineshank155)

Whispered X (Spineshank155)

  • 166 Posts
  • 375 Reply Likes
Not much has changed since the beta. They added a few new features here and there every week or so but it's still a beta. If they think this was ready for prime time, maybe they should look back at the old site and see they have forgotten many of the things, including the about me info, journals and shouts from the past month.

but i haven't seen them listening to the feedback that many people have provided. Not even ones where users came up with a better design than the developers have.
Photo of Chris

Chris

  • 563 Posts
  • 742 Reply Likes
  

As it happens, I've obtained exclusive security camera footage from inside their offices...
(Edited)
Photo of nononsense

nononsense

  • 4 Posts
  • 21 Reply Likes
The old site worked well as a no-threshold place to find new music, and get some overview of concerts going on. There's no money to be earned in that. As a social site it was more or less useless, or just irritating.

The one tiny place where they had the upper hand compared to other websites are also erased, messed up beyond belief: The events section is completely ruined. There's no overview of what I was planning to attend and for some reason it's not listed according to date (some bug I presume) and you can not search by city. Forget the layout, they should've focused on the meaning or reason you would've used the site.
Photo of nononsense

nononsense

  • 4 Posts
  • 21 Reply Likes
For the record, most stuff functioned ok for me. Not had any problems concerning playback or login. Deciding anyway to close all my involvement and not configure any scrobbling anymore. It took them 11 years to get rid of me.
Photo of First Last

First Last

  • 202 Posts
  • 433 Reply Likes
That's the saddest part. You've been here for 11 years. I've been here for 9. Others have been here even longer than that. It's managed to outlive countless other social media platforms for remaining so consistent. I miss Last.FM around 2007. The radio features with built-in scrobbling? The total customization... it was just heaven. I'm willing to work with anybody to get a new site up and running.
Photo of Alin

Alin

  • 165 Posts
  • 477 Reply Likes
"The old site worked well as a no-threshold place to find new music, and get some overview of concerts going on".

Not even the old design wasn't that great. Acceptable, but not great. Instead improving it, they made it much worse.
Photo of Rodriqo Fernandez

Rodriqo Fernandez

  • 1 Post
  • 1 Reply Like
Well ive been a member for over 10 years,i dont ever put a coment up but i just got to this time.
LAST F.M YOUR NEW SITE IS FU*KING SH*T!!!!
i mean what the FU*K are you doing,in most walks of life you dont put things out to the public with flaws in it,your just going to drive them away, and in this game once you start to lose punters its very very hard to get them back!!
So that tells me that
-1.your doing this to actually lose customers?
-2.The guys at last.fm have no idea about marketing & reatail ?
YOU BUNCH OF DULLARDS
Photo of SpaceOctopus

SpaceOctopus

  • 3 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
I don't see how anyone could be surprised, honestly. What the hell were they thinking?! You only get 4 similar songs now on a page? That's retarded beyond belief, considering it's literally the only thing left worth even using. Being forced to play radio in-browser (not ok for a power user with hundreds of tabs!) and letting spotify remove the only reason I used Spotify (last.fm playlists & recommendations on there were truly priceless. I am leaving spotify because it's gone now.) as well as this entire new sh1tty site that is complete garbage & overly "simplified" in an effort to be "minimalist" and attract the lowest common denominator of idiots incapable of figuring out a simple website with ACTUAL features, I've had it up to HERE with this crap. I'm about to walk out the door & forget all about this site I've spent YEARS aggregating my music with so I could recommendations & similar music. This was the only service in the world I felt could recommend music I actually liked & was similar to the music I chose. No other service even does that right, not even close.

Pandora sucks, Spotify radio is just as bad. If there's anyone out there who knows an alternative that actually does a good job at this (preferably without devoting years of  "scrobbling" only to be devastated when it decides to screw everyone over), please let me know? I'm dying for something. Yeah, true, I have more music than I know what to do with & probably ever will listen to, but that's a result of me trying to do this all on my own.

200 characters on my profile about section is stupid, too.

I don't mind beta releases of things with bugs, but this is just a failure every single way you look at it, and it's not a problem with bugs whatsoever. Your users, US, HATE it. We absolutely hate everything about it. So listen to us. Otherwise you'll die a slow, painful, silent death & a few years will go by -not many- before we can't even remember what Last.fm even was.

This conversation is no longer open for comments or replies.