Allow comments on shared items with no comments

Samuel Clay, Official Rep

6026 Posts
1367 Reply Likes

If you want to comment on a story, why not share that story? Alternatively, reply to somebody who has. But I don't like the idea of having a free radical shared comment with no requirement to back it by your own share.

Comment

View previous…

2013-04-11T03:30:47+00:00

29 Posts
8 Reply Likes

You're replying to the share itself, rather than to the comment on the share. The same "reply" button, which opens a text entry box, is still relevant.

P.S.: AWESOME!

2013-04-11T03:52:06+00:00

Samuel Clay, Official Rep

6026 Posts
1367 Reply Likes

But in order to reply to them, you would have to hit something to reply to. More than one of your friends might be sharing it. Oh, and I can't add anything to the control list (train/save/share). It's crowded enough as it is. This is the dilemma and why it hasn't shipped. The backend supports it just fine.

2013-04-11T04:18:45+00:00

29 Posts
8 Reply Likes

OK, let's take a step back. In the old Reader (I'm sorry if I keep using this as a touchstone, but it was so great), if more than one of your friends shared something, the share was not coalesced into a single item; you'd see the shared item multiple times, each of which could be commented on. That's one way to go about it, and probably what I was expecting to happen because I hadn't thought about any other way.

The other way would be to share it implicitly, and add your avatar to the list of people who shared it. The trick would be to syndicate your comment to all instances of the share that you can see. This would lower the perception that "sharing is endorsement". But even then, what if you knew your other friends wouldn't be into the share, or you didn't want to talk about it with them, but you did want to have a discussion with the people who could see it on your friend's original commentless share?

I think my first paragraph gets to the heart of the confusion: people don't expect multiple shares to be coalesced into a single entity whose origin is now obscured. The significant speech act is perceived to be the share itself, and the identity of the sharer changes what the actual message is. "Samuel said foo," is something you can reply to; "A bunch of people said foo," is, as you point out, difficult to engage with.

There is a lot of surprising behavior for users here.

EDIT: What happens if multiple people share something with initial comments? Can't you just insert an invisible default comment in case none was supplied?

2013-04-11T04:23:05+00:00

29 Posts
8 Reply Likes

One more thing: this issue, https://getsatisfaction.com/newsblur/... , also is relevant. It's more than just "I want to be able to see the comment and the content at the same time." Having the initial comment at the top, made upon sharing, is a framing device for the reader of the share to understand why the sharer shared. When someone is replying to the share, they aren't necessarily replying to the initial comment, which is why its proper place is before the content of the share.

2013-08-23T19:31:18+00:00

Chris Hiestand

17 Posts
1 Reply Like

How about an option to allow friends (and maybe public) to comment on your story?

orthodonticjake

9 Posts
13 Reply Likes

I don't want to share the story because I want to comment on my friend's shared story. I can't reply to her shared story because she didn't know that she had to add a comment when sharing her story in order for me to comment on it. Essentially, you can share a story without a comment, and that means that it's closed for interaction from your friends. That's unexpected and nonsensical, and without coming to getsatisfaction, I never would have known that the reason we couldn't comment on each others' shared items is because we didn't leave initial comments on them.

Comment

10 people like this

Garrett Guillotte

31 Posts
0 Reply Likes

"I don't like the idea of having a free radical shared comment with no requirement to back it by your own share."

"Back it by your own share" implies that sharing is endorsement. If sharing is endorsement, and I want to comment on a share without endorsing it, I'm unable to do so unless the original sharer remembered to leave "//" as a comment first.

See also:
https://getsatisfaction.com/newsblur/... (7 likes)
https://getsatisfaction.com/newsblur/... (6 likes)

Comment

Bryn

41 Posts
3 Reply Likes

It seems to be 2 trains of thought here for the following scenario:

Scenario. user1 wants to share a story, but they don't feel they have a comment about the story. User2 who follows user1 finds the story interesting and wants to add a comment about the story.

There are 2 ways with the current system to deal with this

1) User2 is unable to comment story because User1 did not leave a comment on the story so they have to re-share the story with their comment

2) when User1 share the story they add a "useless" comment such as a "*" or something like that, so this story now has a comment which would allow User2 to comment on the story

Basically I would like to be able to do option 2 above without have to add a "useless" comment so people can comment on something I have shared. I know I am not the only person that does this because I have seen a number of users doing this.

I don't think that this comment would be a "free radical" the comment would be attached to the item that was shared by User1, it just happens that the first comment is by User2 instead of User1

It just seems a bit strange that you have to reshare an item just to leave a comment, you may not necessarily want to share the item you just want to leave a comment.

Comment

2 people like this

rchlnnmllr

15 Posts
5 Reply Likes

For those of us that don't want random strangers commenting on their shares, this option isn't about "free radicals," it's about our friends. What we want is the ability to have conversations about things online, without the inevitable public riffraff trolling. Conversations, between friends (and friends of friends on their shares) with real privacy controls. I've been reluctant to put comments on my shares because they are public. And the lack of privacy controls is the major reason my circle of friends from Google Reader have refused to make the switch.

I want the people I've allowed to follow me to be able to comment on my shares even if I didn't leave a comment. And I want people who don't aren't allowed to follow me to have no idea those comments are happening.

Comment

5 people like this

Samuel Clay, Official Rep

6026 Posts
1367 Reply Likes

I just [silently] launched those privacy controls. You can test them out by going to Manage > Profile. I think that will do much of what you're looking for. I'll be blogging about it soon.

Comment

karen

178 Posts
31 Reply Likes

Hooray! So, I see this in "Profile & Blurblog" > Privacy. But how do I approve people ("Only people I approve can see my shared stories and reply to me")? Is it assumed that those I follow and follow me back have approval?

Comment

Samuel Clay, Official Rep

6026 Posts
1367 Reply Likes

If somebody requests to follow you, you'll get an email and they'll show up on your dashboard.

Comment

karen

178 Posts
31 Reply Likes

So, those that I've already followed/have followed me are already in my secret club? If I decide I suddenly hate one of my [existing] close friends' opinions and want to block them, how do I do that?

Comment

1 person likes this

Samuel Clay, Official Rep

6026 Posts
1367 Reply Likes

Yup, follower removal is something I'll be adding soon.

Comment

Ian Gray

6 Posts
8 Reply Likes

Any follow up on this topic?

As I posted in the other topic on this question, it's really important to be able to comment on the shares of your friends. This is what Google Reader allowed and if you can't do it, it is exactly the sort of thing that will stop us from migrating to you. It's making NewsBlur a hard sell to the old Reader crowd.

Comment

3 people like this

Chris Hiestand

17 Posts
1 Reply Like

Yes, please address this problem. It doesn't seem to be addressed by those privacy controls.

Comment

Holly

4 Posts
7 Reply Likes

I want the people I've allowed to follow me to be able to comment on my shares even if I didn't leave a comment.

Comment

4 people like this

29 Posts
8 Reply Likes

I don't have much to add, other than everyone I know wants this feature. Furthermore, from a UI consistancy point of view, the expectation is that "shared story is commentable". Whether or not it was shared with a comment initially is completely immaterial, and the fact that that makes a difference is a bad case of abstraction breaking/implementation leaking.

Comment

6 people like this

Greg

10 Posts
0 Reply Likes

+1 for this. It really just seems to make sense to allow comments on posts that don't already have a comment on them.

If there's opposition to enabling it across the board, maybe make it an opt-in in preferences?

Comment

orthodonticjake

9 Posts
13 Reply Likes

I'm really disappointed with your response to this issue. The most enticing features of Newsblur were its sharing features, but this renders them unusable. Not only that: it paints a grim picture of your understanding of software usability in general.

Despite paying for your service, I've switched over to Feedly. If the sharing features improve, I'll consider switching back.

Comment

2 people like this

Ken Wehr

6 Posts
6 Reply Likes

Samuel, I feel like you still haven't addressed the main issue here.

I switched from Reader to Newsblur. I even paid money for it. I got a bunch of my friends to do likewise. Very positive reviews from everyone, with one notable exception: we all end up sharing items with a "//" comment for the sole purpose of allowing comments from each other. Such an annoying work-around for preserving the one key feature we loved most in Reader.

Please either implement this, or, if there's a fundamental decision NOT to implement this, please communicate it clearly.

Frankly, most of us will probably abandon Newsblur if this feature isn't on the roadmap.

Comment

1 person likes this

Samuel Clay, Official Rep

6026 Posts
1367 Reply Likes

I believe I've communicated this clearly enough - I can not figure out a decent way to get the UI built to support this workflow. It's more complex than what I have now, and if I can't figure out a simple way to allow it, it just won't happen. I want to build it, but for the life of me I can't figure out a NewsBlur-ish way to do it.

Comment

2013-05-11T01:45:16+00:00

francisco delatorre

39 Posts
2 Reply Likes

the last i checked, it was more of an "i'll think about how to fold this into the newsblur paradigm", whereas now the answer is more bleak. if you can't figure out how to get this to work, that's perfectly fine. but if someone were interested in taking a stab at getting this feature working, would you be open to a github pull of that code? you've got a lot of people on your side here, and even if they're dissatisfied with the current state of things, they're eager to help out. would you be open to using that resource?

Ken Wehr

6 Posts
6 Reply Likes

Okay, so maybe I'm missing something. What's complex about adding a "Comment" button to shared items that don't already have a comment?

Comment

2 people like this

Ian Gray

6 Posts
8 Reply Likes

Samuel, your only post in this thread not about unrelated privacy controls was to say "if you want to comment then share it" and people rightly said this was silly. All we wanted was to allow your followers to comment on your shared posts, regardless of whether you remembered to add the inelegant "//" comment.

Anyway, thanks at least for the clear answer that NewsBlur won't do what we want.

Comment

1 person likes this

29 Posts
8 Reply Likes

I'm still curious about what happens if multiple people share an item with a comment, and how that's currently handled. If it's sane, then automatically adding an invisible dummy comment to a share without a comment should make everyone happy.

Comment

ambience

1 Post
1 Reply Like

When I first started using NewBlur for sharing articles, it was only after one of my friends poked me after a few shared stories of mine that I learned no comments were allowed on ones I didn't initially comment on. It's not expected behavior from folks coming from Reader, and there really is no indicator of this by default.

Right now, I see a whole lot of rogue '//' comments instead of genuine ones. While it's not the intended use of the feature, it's what's happening. I'd much prefer to see a comment button without inserted random characters being the workaround most folks use.

Comment

1 person likes this