Reply to uncommented share

  • 10
  • Idea
  • Updated 7 years ago
Courtney Stanton brought this up around the launch of social. When someone shares a story without typing remarks, there's no way to reply directly to them. You can reshare the story with your own remarks, but that's not the same idea.

As Courtney predicted, what you see people do to work around this limitation is put junk characters in the comment box of every share in order to invite replies. This practice in turn makes the share vs. comment counts in the top bar meaningless.

A better fix would be to have a reply button underneath every post in someone's blurblog, even if they didn't type anything. The system could then create a blank root comment for that share, under which the new reply thread would go.
Photo of Elfpill

Elfpill

  • 28 Posts
  • 15 Reply Likes

Posted 7 years ago

  • 10
Photo of Garrett Guillotte

Garrett Guillotte

  • 31 Posts
  • 0 Reply Likes
See also:
https://getsatisfaction.com/newsblur/...
https://getsatisfaction.com/newsblur/...

Samuel Clay (Official Rep) 4 days ago
If you want to comment on a story, why not share that story? Alternatively, reply to somebody who has. But I don't like the idea of having a free radical shared comment with no requirement to back it by your own share.
Photo of Elfpill

Elfpill

  • 28 Posts
  • 15 Reply Likes
Yeah, I realized after hitting send that I should've bumped one of those threads.