## This topic was archived on Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:02:31 +0000

Archived because: Problem solved

# The Best Photographers of 2014 NEW RULES Edit Subject

I just got a email stating that this year they are taking a persons total points in a category to determine Best Photographers of 2014. What this is saying is that its quantity and not quality that now counts. So if a person has 25 photos scoring say 650 or higher and a other person as 100 photos of 400 scores the one with 100 poor scoring photos gets the Best Photographers of 2014. Does this make sense to anyone.

4 people have
this problem
This topic is no longer open for comments or replies.
• 1
Well your argument is wrong because unlike the old system where quantity counted and a member could scale the leader board with hundreds of 20% & 10% awards and end the year at the top ! Now with the graded points the only way to reach the top of the leader board and maintain a top place is to consistently submit good quality images that get in the top 10 week after week !

A far better way than saying someone who submits 10 good images in 365 days is the best photographer of the year ! which the old system was based on ?
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• Thanks Ralph for the reply but I still don't understand how this is going to work. Please explain more....Augie
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• 1
from what i understand the old system was based on the top ten scoring images each tog took in each category were averaged and that score was used to determine the top 20 photographers of the year, when in actual fact all you have is the top 20 highest scoring images,?

so this year it is being based on the leader board scores, so the top 20 scoring togs who have consistently scored high enough to reach the top of the leader board will be called the top 20 photographers of the year ? in my mind the correct way to do it points based not on 10 good images ?

This could not be done in the past for the exact reason you mentioned first but now the points system is set up with a fair distribution it is only possible to get to the top with quality and not quantity !
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• Thanks Ralph for taking the time to explain this I am sure it not only helped me to understand but many others....Augie
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• Augie is right,i agree with him,
a lot of players out over 1,000 images that take 10 % or 20% of the prize , which make a total assembled a larger number than someone who throws 50 images with the number of points over 700 , does that mean that such a photographer be ranked higher at the end of the year?
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• Hi Augie and Dejan, as Ralph explained, points for place awards (#1 - #10) are much higher then points for 5%, 10% and 20% in same category. We have checked and almost all photographers would got Photographer of the year accolade in either method (this years calculation and previous years calculation).

I hope this helps.
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• Jasenka why don't they just post the actual method they are going to use so we all will know and fully understand it. I don't thinks that's to much to ask. the old one is still on the site just replace that one with the new one...Thanks
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• I’m amused
In short, nothing really changes. As Jasenka explained, either of the methods will still yield almost the same results. That means, even if you submitted a thousand images in a year, still, your best 10 images and not the 990 images will determine your ranking. Why? Because that's how statistics works!
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• I Think the confusion is over which points are used,? There is a score each image gets in the daily, weekly & monthly competitions, and there are the points each image is allotted for the award won.

If an image scores 600 points for a daily submission and gets top 10% it will in the animals category receive an award of around 70 points which are added to the leader board total, A 5% would net around 120 points and a 20% would be only 20 ish, but the top 10 in animals can be in the 1000s

It is these points that are used to work out the player ranking and the end of year awards under the new system, unlike last year when it was the points awarded to the image ! ie the original 600.
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• So one photo in the top ten awards is worth as much as 100s of photos in the top 20% . its very clear now....how did you get that info.

Thanks again Ralph..
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• The only thing that its not clear for me regarding the new method is...why didnot you post this method at the very beginning of the year? Do you think it is fair to change the rules at the very end? Dont you think there could be players that feel they are being foolished?
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• Can a player make a request to be excluded from this new "Best Photographers" consideration? (I mean other than asking Pixoto to remove all of the player's images?)
Rather than (potentially) getting some mediocre-ranking accolade, I'd prefer not to get anything at all.

(This move of quantity-over-quality is saddening, albeit probably makes some business sense.)
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• There is no Quantity over Quality issue if you read the thread the new points system eliminated that last year !

The only way to reach the Top of the leader board is to Consistently submit good quality images that get top 10 places 5%, 10% & 20% awards will never get you there the points you get are too low !

Its about time people moved on from the old moan "quantity-over-quality" It dose not exist it just shows how ill informed and out dated some members are !
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• I thought this was well explained Ralph by you and I don't understand why anyone is still questioning it.
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• What really matters is the points from the upcoming yearly awards (to which points from daily, weekly, and monthly awards pale in comparison).
A top 10 image is only worth six (in the case of #10) to twenty (in the case of #1) top 5% images.
And as an old-timer, I know from experience that making HUNDREDS of top 5% images of the year (minimum score of around mere 650) is a FAR easier feat than making a single top 10 image of the year (minimum score of around 800!).
So, in accumulating points, quantity will definitely win over quality.

Don't get me wrong, i can understand that the new rule may make better sense (at least from a business standpoint), but telling people that there is no quantity-over quality issue would insult our intelligence.
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• So, can a player make a request to be excluded from this new "Best Photographers" consideration?
• Sure - we could take you out of the running. That said, given that you have the #1 and #5 image of the year in People right now I would expect to see your rank rise substantially when annual awards are assigned. You could always ask us to remove the badge after it is assigned...
• Yes, please take me out of the running, Jason. Thanks.
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• If for 12 months competitions the competitions are based solely on quality over quantity to argue that the end of year awards are based on the reverse makes as much sense as the points analysis in your post above ?

The whole point of end of year awards is to give a final ranking to the years quality images, after all any low ranked non quality images will not get into the end of year awards !

As for opting out, you have been happy to get the award under its previous name for the last 2 years so why the sudden moan this year ? the only difference is its based on all your images not just your best 10 !
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• To settle the issue I suggest Pixoto should just make two types of banners: TOP CONTRIBUTORS of the YEAR (based on the new rule) & BEST PHOTOGRAPHERS of the YEAR (for those togs with images in the top 20 - all category).

Honestly, I can't really appreciate one be named best photographer of the year if you see in their profile just full of flowers or just full of animals, etc., Unless, the banner will be specific like BEST PHOTOGRAPHER of the YEAR (Animal Category), etc.

In my opinion, those togs with images in the top 20 are truly the best! Other than that, they're just good and better.
How does this make you feel?
I'm
• Firstly, regardless of whether they are good measures of quality, points from daily, weekly, and monthly awards are not significant when compared with points from yearly awards. (Take this image for an example: http://www.pixoto.com/images/54476519...
It got 838,788 points from yearly award but mere 73,464, 19,884, and 3,378 from its monthly, weekly, and daily awards respectively.)
So I'll just focus on what really matters: points from the yearly awards.

Pixoto's distribution of points is just not smooth enough: it's extremely skewed towards the best TEN images. So, for example, the #11th best image of the year (let's say with a score of 799) will get exactly the same points as the, say, #7,000th image with a score of, say, 650, because they would both get a top 5% yearly award.
Considering that images with huge quality difference could be getting similar points, it's clear that the points-based new rule cannot be taken as a serious measure of quality. And hence players who are concerned with quality (i.e. actively curating their own works) should be given a chance of opting out. IMHO.
How does this make you feel?