Help get this topic noticed by sharing it on Twitter, Facebook, or email.
I’m adventurous

Add "Quality" to Walk Score: "Scenic, Beautiful, Decent, Dangerous, Unwalkable"

Walking score considers proximity to parks, but shouldn't it consider the quality of the walk? For example, sidewalks, tree-lined avenues, traffic noise, trails, etc. I want to be close enough to useful places, but I also want to enjoy my walk.

If there are no sidewalks and a lot of traffic, then even if something is across the street, it's nearly unwalkable. Paths and trails make areas more walker friendly. Many areas in Portland, OR have no crosswalk buttons because there are so many people walking, it's assumed someone needs to cross and the crosswalk light always gives pedestrians the right of way.

So, you have safety/walkability, aesthetic, and proximity.
3 people like
this idea